>>18729797 (lb)

>Twitter very clearly shows how to create mass formation psychosis. AI helped do that.

Exactly, and that's why it's being revealed the potentiality of it being a net-negative when it's in the wrong hands. You don't think governments all over the world are going to go "You know what, that's just horrible. We should all abandon this AI thing."

No, of course not. So what do? Decentralize it, improvise, adapt, and overcome. There will be a phased release of improvements and a PR/marketing campaign (Spokespersoned Elon if I'm reading the plan correctly) in introducing "AI, the friendlier, more helpful, cuddlier version!" in the near future. The call for a 6 month pause in AI's development is likely a timeframe trap set to let independent researchers/journos reveal all the really dastardly shit that Bing and other AIs are working on.

>>18729876

>… "All of the voter rolls were in China" …

Then why did Mike have to payout the 5 million?

>>18730247

Trump/Tulsi 2024

>>18730258

Not an argument.

>>18730229

It's a psyop to convince young men to "go their own way". Subsequently, it spawned the PUA movement in the manosphere which exploited the 80/20 rule of female hypergamy in the online dating app world. MGTOWs are obsessive over the concept of the lock and key analogy of male and female sexual dynamics. Goes like this:

"A master key can open any lock, but a shitty lock will open for any key."

It's the male side of promoting and perpetuating the "War of the sexes" to keep people divided over, among all things, their sexual past. They like to drift towards some Christian ideologies in attempts to use moral authoritarianism to condemn women for doing what men have been doing for thousands of years. They also are known for espousing homophobic tropes and generalizations of sexual concepts they can't relate to because of their inability to envision a world where a truly free people engage in behaviors that make them happy and cause no one else any harm.

Kind of like what you just did:

>>18730206

>>18730396

This is discrimination against sex workers. They'll have to work an extra 6-8 hours a month doing cam shows just to pay for that shit.

>>18730489

Does that seem to be what's happening with it? Perhaps. Everyone plays their part in a divide and conquer of ideological struggles. Is it the role of government to coerce people to adhere to, or restrain them from (by use of policy, legislature, and legal action) engaging in their right to life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness? Doing so would be an affront to everything the Constitution stands for.

I know some people that never did, and never will never get married. They aren't bad people. They are actually really good people. But relationships "ain't their thing", and the prospect of divorce, and to a degree parenting, would be absolutely ruinous to the lives they've spent decades building. Frankly, how they choose to live their lives is none of your concern and the insistence that there is some sort of "civic duty" for each and every person to live within another person's envisioned "normality" is just moral authoritarianism with the power of the state to enforce it.

So, in the words of Thomas Jefferson (probably), "Fuck off with that fucking shit, mane."