Nice projection kike.
Jewish supremacism is going tpo bring backlash to ALL jews, so its your tribe's own sense of jewish identity that will bring the backlash to all jews.
You kikes that can't see that are dumb as fuck.
Now a bonus:
Who killed Jesus?
The Liberal Catholics of our country are now making another concession to Interfaith charity and Brotherhood benevolence. They are saying, "It was not the Jews who crucified Christ; it was the Romans."
I should like to ask these Liberal Catholics a few pointed questions on the subject of Our Lord's death.
Was it the Romans who came out to seize Him in the Garden of Olives with swords and clubs on the night of His Passion, and who brought Him bound to the High Priest, and then to Pontius Pilate, demanding that He should be killed?
Was it a Roman who betrayed Jesus with a kiss, and was it to Romans He was sold for thirty pieces of silver?
Was the High Priest a Roman, who rent his garments and accused Our Lord of blasphemy when He declared Himself to be the Eternal Son of God?
Was it a Roman crowd which stood before the tribunal of Pontius Pilate and shouted: "If this man were not a malefactor we would not have handed Him over to you … His blood be upon us and upon our children!"
Was it the Romans who disowned Jesus as the King of the Jews, and did not want the inscription placed over His head on the Cross when He hung, crowned with thorns, and with nails in His hands and His feet?
Was it God's judgement in Heaven that the Romans had killed Christ, and was that why the Power of the Almighty some thirty years later razed the Temple of Jerusalem to the ground, and left not one stone upon a stone, and has never allowed it to be rebuilt from that day to this?
In the prayers of the Mass for Good Friday of Holy Week, the priest refers to the "perfidious Jews" as the ones who betrayed and crucified Christ. Should he be saying the "perfidious Romans"? And has it been wrong for the Church to put it the first way for as long as her history?
When Our Lord hung upon the Cross, His first recorded words were, "Father forgive them for they know not what they do."
Do the Liberal Catholics really think Our Lord was referring to the Jews when He said, "They know not what they do"? Was it the Jewish Chief Priests, the Scribes, and the Ancients, with whom He sat daily teaching in the Temple and who, when He was crucified, wagged their heads and mocked Him and shouted: "He saved others; himself He cannot save" – was it these who knew not what they did, and whom Our Lord asked the Father to forgive?
Saint Luke tells us clearly that Jesus said this of the Roman soldiers who "dividing his garments, cast lots." And Saint Matthew tells us that these same Romans, after Jesus expired on the Cross, cried out in one voice with their Centurion, "Indeed, this was the Son of God!".
BIGGEST DIG ON JEWISH SUBVERSION IN THE US
2000 pages of fully sourced digs on jewish subversion in the US
http://holywar.org/jewishtr/wvr.htm
Are you ready to go down the rabbit hole?
>QUESTION #1:
Is the profoundly disproportionate social, cultural, economic,
and political influence upon America and the western world
by a small, largely ethnocentric, international minority
group healthy for democracy? And is it healthy,
ultimately, for the minority itself?
>QUESTION #2:
What elephant in the living room? Do you mean
the one we're forbidden to talk about?
>THE PAST:
"Over representation in the economic elite of a visible ethnic minority of the degree found in Poland and Hungary was certain to cause trouble regardless of the identity of the group: if Belgians, Bulgarians, or Bolivians had constituted 62 per cent of the highest income-earners of Hungary, rather than Jews, that would certainly engendered resentment against them … To us [Jews], European antisemitism appears to be a weapon of the strong against the weak, a kind of ideological sadism. To European right-wing nationalists of the post-1870 period, however, antisemitism appeared to be a weapon of the weak against the strong, an attempt (as they saw it) by a downtrodden nation to regain control over its resources from a separate, distinctive minority which appeared to dominate the economy – an aim not unlike that of anti-colonial movements in the Third World vis-a-vis the Europeans and foreign entrepreneurial minorities (like the Chinese throughout South-East Asia). The Zionist movement understood this perfectly well, however disturbing such a perspective may seem to us viewed with post-Holocaust eyes.
Moreover, research is most likely to demonstrate a very considerable actual Jewish over-representation in many other social and political areas which figured largely in the litany of continental antisemitism of the post-1870 period, especially Jewish participation in the radical left, the liberal professions, in journalism, and in the media."
– W. D. Rubinstein, Jewish Journal of Sociology, Vol. 42, nos. 1 and 2, 2000, p. 18-19
The Present:
Follow the blue "Open Book" button above, or click here, to read the book When Victims Rule. A Critique of Jewish Pre-eminence in America, a clearinghouse for information featuring over 10,000 citations from about 4,000 (scholarly and mainstream media) bibliographic sources.
Cry more kike.
Until you kikes stop calling anyone who makes legit criticism on jewish supremacism shills, you are only incresing the backlash against all jews, you stupid fucking yid.
READ THIS YOU DUMB ASS KIKE
Modern Jewish identity has become a collective aggression, a collective demand, a collective accusation, a collective insistence upon continued, never-ending reparation and further power. As the old saying goes, there are two sides to every story – but the non-Jewish side of history (in its interaction with Jews) is afforded absolutely no forum anywhere in popular culture.
2-
In the long term, endlessly one-sided “victim” assaults upon alleged oppressors are not healthy solutions to interethnic tensions. True resolvement, true health, is a dialogue, an exchange, and exploration of mutual prejudices (and the reasons for them), and a willingness to be drawn to sympathy for the others’ side – not merely consistent concession to one group’s accusation and demand.
Fuck you kike. Keep increasing the backlash.
"I also take a kind of perverse pleasure in the thought that the most important
and influential book ever written is the product of Jewish thought … I call it
'perverse' becaue it is an instance of national pride which I don't want to feel
and which I fight against constantly …"I remember once a fellow Jew remarking
with satisfaction on the high percentage of Nobel Prize winners who were Jewish.
I said, 'Does that make you feel superior?' 'Of course,' he said. 'What if I told you
that sixty percent of the pornographers and eighty percent of the crooked Wall
Street manipulators wre Jewish? He was startled. 'Is that true?' 'I don't know. I
made up the figures. But what if it were true? Would it make you feel inferior?'
He had to think about that. It's much easier to find reasons to consider oneself
superior than inferior. But one is just the mirror image of the other.'"
– Isaac Asimov, 1994, p. 322