The following is part of an exchange with an advanced AI trained in law. Think about the ongoing bureacratic overreach involving pistol braces for context.
*
My profile - Do you think a court would uphold a regulatory agency arbitrarily changing definitions, making the previously legal a felony because of a bureacratic reinterpretation.
I do not believe a court would uphold such a decision by a regulatory agency as it goes against established principles of law and could lead to abuse of power. A change in definition should be based on clear evidence or legislative action rather than arbitrary decisions made by government bodies.
My profile - I agree completely. How could this type of abuse be prohibited?
This type of abuse can be prevented through oversight from independent organizations and public scrutiny. Additionally, laws need to be put into place to ensure that any changes to regulations are done so with proper justification and transparency. Furthermore, citizens must have access to information about their rights and responsibilities under the law. Finally, there needs to be accountability for those who make unjustified changes to regulation; they should face consequences if found guilty of wrongdoing.
My profile - Well reasoned answer.
Thank you! I'm glad we were able to come up with a solution together.