>>18750138 (lb)

>Well anyways how can you prove nature doesn't care? The world-wide hive is too complex to assume. Fruits are at least some sort of sign.

How does one prove a negative?

Anon prefers to view every living organism as part or a cell of a greater collective. Let's call it God for want of a better term.

As with any living organism or collection of cells, if you prefer, there will be maladies, infections and dis-ease, Do these also have a collective consciousness and will?

Anon knows not.

As an FYI, fruits in the plural is more often used for a collective of homosexuals.

Fruit is generally an uncountable noun.

>>18750174

>What exactly makes him African?

What exactly makes the majority of "African Americans" African?

The term is an insult and affront to negroes and will never pass anon's lips as an adjective for anyone.

Do we call American Caucasians "European Americans"?.

>>18750198

>LEADER were TRAITORS. Activists were PAID ACTORS!

Well, yes. There is no need to shout

Most thinking people are well aware of this.

Reparations, anyone?

How to fight back.

You think the average person would agree to hundreds of thousands of dollars to be paid to people who were never slaves by people who never owned slaves?

I can't say I know one who would be willing to bank this.

>>18750215

>>18750230

>>18750221

>I can't say I know one who would be willing to bank this.

Is this self destruction of the narrative?

>>18750226

Noice!

>>18750235

As an FYI. Anon mirrored her B.

A crumb?

>>18750249

Is she above gloatery?

>>18750267

>NEW DJT

Except you appear to have forgotten the statement, Mr. Clickbait Gay Arsed Faggot.

>>18750299

Dubs confirm that this makes me feel like it will probably be notable.

>>18750307

>Reuters want you to believe that Voters say neither Biden nor Trump should run in 2024

FIFY

>>18750311

> (which wouldn't be that bad now that I think of it)

Has she gobbled as much knob as Heels up, who could even still be our whore?

>>18750333

Trips confirm retardation.

Chekk spelling, always.

>18750372

>>18750396

>Takes one to know one.

This has to most retarded teenage retort ever.

So, are you saying that if I recognise an effeminate man as a homosexual by the way he walks, the clothes that he wears and the bag full of cocks that he is greedily snaffling down, then I must also be a greedy knob swallowing faggot?

Also, if I recognise a beautiful woman as such then I must also be one?

Interesting logic.

>>18750455

>you can't tell a person with the fondness for other men by how they dress and walk, anon.

and with the addition of a bag full of cocks going down their throats without touching the sides?

Methinks the latter is the clincher.