Anonymous ID: 0b747a June 23, 2018, 10:02 a.m. No.1875902   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5917

It is his business and he can run it as he see's fit.

That being said. Put him out of business. Boycot this ass.

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5877545/Sarah-Sanders-gets-kicked-Virginia-restaurant.html

Anonymous ID: 0b747a June 23, 2018, 10:07 a.m. No.1875941   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5976

>>1875917

I agree and support Sarah's actions. I also agree with the restraunt owner being able to do as she pleases with her business. I disagree with what happened and the result of those actions should be met economically. Failure to meet customer expectations is a good way to ruin your business. The government should not dictate to whom you must or must not do business with.

Anonymous ID: 0b747a June 23, 2018, 10:30 a.m. No.1876188   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6305

>>1876134

I hate it, but I agree.

When a long train of abusesโ€ฆ..

It is time to fight fire with fire. The issue is, you do not have any thing downstream in the lawsuit chain that will support this action. It will be lost or thown out simply because you'd be attempting to convict the queen in her own court, and as you know, that never happens.

Short of actual war on the street, another way must be found. Unless we want to start the fight on the street over this.

Anonymous ID: 0b747a June 23, 2018, 10:50 a.m. No.1876372   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1876345

That's only part of the point.

There wasn't a problem until the government stepped in to demand that one group be favored over another.

Remove the government's behavior and the problem goes away. If a libtard bitches about someone not baking a cake, and the government said We can't help you, go somewhere else to get your cake, this would not be an issue.