>>1875809

Not really sure what the point of that was but it may as well have said:

>>1875855

Bakers got a tough job.

I have trouble reading an entire bread before 2 more have past. I don't know how it is even possible to read a bread and make an honest assessment of notables while simultaneously creating a new bread and taking flak from all sides.

Thanks Bakers

>>1876129

Pretty sad that Herman Munster is better looking then him.