I really hate it when anons make claims without proof and then won't answer when they're called out on it.

>>1875066

>yesterday they were criticizing new bakers

>using bakers lounge so as not to shit up the

>bread.

Please do not slander the lounge.

There were no anons there working against the bakers

>>1875168

>>1875448

>pic related

It's hard enough to get people to volunteer to bake

Training them and helping them to learn takes time and conversation as well as actual baking

Please do not make it harder than it has to be by slandering the practice kitchen.

WWG1WGA

>>1875917

>She should have stood her ground and invoked the gay cake defense.

anon…

There are 3 people you need to stay on good terms with

God

Spouse

Bartender / Cook

Would you seriously consider eating at a place where the cook didn't like you?

>>1876058

>>1876077

to be a good baker you must have;

excellent reading speed & comprehension

some level of understanding of imageboard operation & culture

the ability to use critical thinking and discernment in the choice of notables

the ability to use editorial discretion when updating the dough

the ability to create enticing & informative bread titles

the ability to work well under pressure

thick skin to ignore haters clowns, shills & shitposters

that's just off the top of my head list of qualifications. We are damn lucky Q knew enough to choose this type of free speech forum, the average IQ & level of knowledge found here as well as the reverence for free speech is unsurpassed anywhere

we do it for free

WWG1WGA

Vincit Omnia Veritas

Semper Vigilans

>>1876175

I offered you two (2) chances to correct the slander in the bread.

Why didn't you?

Anons attacking bakers is a problem. You did not attack bakers directly but your slander upon the practice kitchen needed to be corrected.

And yes, I do feel better.