>>18771113 (pb)

that's not a prayer, but a curse.

like I said, when you call out the gollums to attack, they look for you, their daddy, and bring it to you.

don't linger on the highway, anon.

if you need to change a tire, I suggest you just drive to the exit.

you said how it will happen. that's for you.

you put it out, you have it looking for you now.

everytime you're walking around on the highway and that big truck comes your way . . . will that be your time?

you called it. it looks for you. the curse has you as it's daddy.

Last night it was pointed out that there is a Bulger connection to Hunter, and that information never made it into notables.

see:

>>18769827 (pb)

and review that bread for information.

and yes, the guy is Whitey Bulger's nephew.

>>18771177

I'll I can get out of your post is

'duh'

I bet you say that a lot.

>>18771186

why are you chiming in on this.

you teh 'duh shill' ip hopping?

no matter what if you comment there is a tag team going on.

the duffus crew of haters and scoffers and bullies loves to pretend to gang up on people.

>>18771217

well, Adam, they won't be voting for you . . .

>>18771223

he'd change the motto to

Make spoiled trust fund rich kid sellouts great again

MSTFRKSGA

that won't work as a slogan.

I'm not going to link who this is for.

any discussion of that topic by anyone not on the duffus team gets you banned.

>>18771251

how so?

did you see the stuff last bread baker was posting?

you understand that bakers aren't holy men, right?

some say that some of them aren't even MAGA, and are shilling against Q.

is that too hard to understand.

if you don't now that then you're the shill, person who comments in a one-post spuriously and out of the blue.

>>18771268

whenever crybaby baker would post there was always that, and gore.

and it always showed up in the same sequence, starting with the posting of redheads with giant fish on a boat.

and they persona of that crybaby baker hasn'

t been around here lately , has it?

why is that?

do tell me if you know.

in any case of course if they are bakers they don't post it with the same device.

the patterns were noted for two months.

the real anon were watching and observing the whole time.

you come in, a new crew, you know nothing about the goings on here and do your shill dominant stuff, discussing your sexuality, and all that.

anyone who lurks , and those of us who are chatty, know the score.

you do it all with plausible deniability.

so what did happen to the crybaby overnight baker? why isn't that persona trotted out as 'annoyance-troll baker crybaby' for the last few days?

You can try to gaslight the anon, but the anon are on to it, and we point it out.

>>18771288

I don't use that word, anon.

so I didn't call him that, did I.

see, you're doing what it did: you say something, then you claim it's the other person who said it.

that is a rule that is used by shills.

whatever they imagine you'd say, which they make up in their head, they act like you really said it.

there is a basic rule that I follow concerning people here: if they are depraved, and go on with glee about the distress that they imagine others have through their efforts at humiliation, then I say 'that isn't a maga person.'

last breads baker didn't pass the test, it was depraved and said some very vile stuff.

the cry baby baker proved over and over that it was either a well scripted AI, consistent in it's methods, or it was a depraved person worthy of being under observation, either in prison or in a mental hospital.

and it cinched it over and over because I kept drawing it out. It had the same pattern , over and over, and I kept notes.

one night it was couching a shill on the best way to post porn to screw with people's sexuality.

and if you think that's a useful behavior for a baker, then what could I say to convince you otherwise.

if you defend that kind of behavior you are condoning it.

so that's why I was saying it over and over to hammer home the point: there are depraved people baking. they are not our friends.

>>18771318

if you condone the ip hopping, and the consistent patterning of that, and it always is the same, then you are as bad as they are.

the patterns were consistent with cry baby baker, anon.

the last bread baker, I didn't say anything about it and CP, I didn't see that.

so go on defending the depraved, and you out yourself as being also depraved.

the thing is, anon, when you're possessed with depravity you just think it's funny.

of course you don't know it.

but when you review and meditate on what you did, you maybe can then see it.

the last baker said depraved things, anon.

I didn't say it posted CP.

I say that overnight cry baby had a consistent pattern. and that also it would probably use multiple devices.

when you dont bother to hear what I say and continue hassling me with nonsensical diversions of the topic, I know you're on their team.

if you aren't possessed, they are.

and you ought not be playing around with demon-festered people, anon.

>>18771346

I've been watching the patterns and I can verify what you say: anyone real is hazed and their time is wasted, the bread is locked, and they delete it even sometimes.

>>18771358

you and your gaslighting.

night after night with the cry baby baker it was the same

for two months.

statistics show things, anon.

patterns are recognizible.

gaslighting only works if people trust you.

the bakers get no trust because they are not earning it.

and you badgering me makes me not trust you either.

arguing with a gaslighter is a waste of time.

so why are you trying to waste my time?

and you must know this about the patterns of the cry baby baker.

why isn't it here anymore?

why is it suddenly gone?

it said "i'll always be here"

and yet it's not here anymore.

ah, and you with the insults

'blind and ignorant'

if you really thought that you would not be shilling your 'oh holy baker how dare you criticize them' bit.

you'd filter and move on and not waste your time copy pasting the board log.

>>18771389

>>18770869 (pb)

> 6387f6

you're ridiculous.

if you think it's OK to call someone what that baker called whoever it was that, an . . .

'oozing . .C . . wound'

then you are as sick minded as that one is.

enough of this. like I said: if you defend these depraved people and harass those who don't put up with it, then you are depraved too.

get help.