https://twitter.com/SKMorefield/status/1653159031383502852
Brutal scene from a street occupation in Oakland on April 30. Now, imagine the (justified) media outcry if a gang of white thugs did that to a black man. Here, because the victim isn’t in a favored class, most major media will likely ignore it.
Its AI Generated but if you look below in the twitter thread, there are the pics of him and Ivanks which are real, so it makes them all look real. So in actuality it has made ALL the REAL pics of the Real Pedos, say Quinten Tarantino and the little foot in his mouth, could be AI generated.
They were real clever in their tweet "LOL even iA knows whats up…." It looks real good at first glance, Normies are probably falling for it all over. I just feel like in a couple months it will make ANY photo to be F&G
If there is a Cloud server and in two months AI uploads a photo, in the future could they make it appear now "in the past" by changing the Date Modified date?
>I'm thinking an image examination tool looking for tell tale signs of AI creation.
>
>Often the AI images have an airbrushed quality and glitches.
Thinking of the fotoForensics Noise Scans or something. if it is generating the whole picture there wouldn't be anything to detect? We would need an AI powered Ai detector tool? It is getting Inception level shit
This had a sensitive content warning and is the kicker. We all know Trumps name was on a flight from Florida to New York but he said it was with Epstein's brother or something
Were these the John and Jane Doe's from Virginia's Case?
TOP KEK!!
https://app.illuminarty.ai/
A quick DDG to find a detector tool
one probability, but without the twitter frame it went way up
>Epstein one def ai. Rubbery face.
Probably the Creepiest i have ever seen him.
What if the lady from the Trump Rape case produces a foto like this. They skipped the DNA sample I heard on X22. A crooked Judge might try and convict tTrump on a shitty AI generated picture using a shitty Ai foto examiner to verify it. The Absolute State of our country
Is that a Teenage Ivanka Nipple sticking out? Sorry I need to global it
Look at Trumps Nose, the fat around the bridge.
I remember seeing her in court during Charlottsville, renting a truck that carries shields and weapons. But i found this story about her getting bombed.
CNN’s Elle Reeve confronted a college Republican about anti-trans speaker Michael Knowles just seconds before an “incendiary device” went off yards away, interrupting them.
Knowles has sparked protests due to his sharply anti-transgender rhetoric, including explicitly calling for the “eradication” of what he calls “transgenderism.”
On Friday’s edition of CNN News Central, Reeve joined anchor John Berman to share a deeply-reported piece that included interviews with trans activists like Charlotte Clymer, and an intense confrontation with Pitt College Republicans VP Josh Minsky that was interrupted by a loud BOOM!:
REEVE (voiceover): More than 11,000 people signed an online petition against Knowles and two other conservative speakers invited to Pitt. The school went forward with the events saying it upholds the principles of protective speech and expression. Though that speech can contradict the school’s values. Knowles had been scheduled to debate Professor Deirdre McCloskey, who is trans. But McCloskey pulled out the week before, telling CNN that Knowles was not a serious person. Then ISI, the sponsor, offered trans writer Charlotte Clymer $10,000 to sub in. She said no.
REEVE (on camera): $10,000 is a lot.
CHARLOTTE CLYMER, WRITER AND ACTIVIST: Oh, yes. $10,000 is a lot of money. That would have paid off my car. That’s half a year of rent.
REEVE: Have you ever been offered that much?
CLYMER: No, not even close.
REEVE: What does that some — say to you?
CLYMER: It says they’re willing to pay anything to grow their entertainment enterprise. I don’t know why trans folks are expected to accept the premise that our humanity is up for debate. If it were a debate on whether or not to allow racial segregation back into society, we wouldn’t have a debate about that. That would be unacceptable.
REEVE (voiceover): Finally, gay libertarian podcaster Brad Polumbo agreed to debate Knowles.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Mr. Polumbo, it’s awesome that you could come here on such short notice. How much were they paying you to do this?
BRAD POLUMBO, GAY LIBERTARIAN PODCASTER: A lot.
REEVE (voiceover): Knowles, through spokeswoman, declined an interview with CNN. And despite the emphasis on free speech, ISI demanded media not film more than the debate’s opening remarks. But once the event got going, no one ushered the media out.
JOSH MINSKY, VICE PRESIDENT, COLLEGE REPUBLICANS AT PITT: Michael Knowles is a big speaker. He should be able to speak and have freedom of speech and sadly that’s, kind of, being shut down in modern society as can you see outside.
REEVE (on camera): But would you have a panel where someone spoke about whether or not there should be legal murder?
MINSKY: No, because —
REEVE: So —
MINSKY: — murder is objectively wrong and you’re killing someone. But I would not put that on the same spectrum.
REEVE: What was that?
MINSKY: As I said about shutting down free speech, I think this is very good example of the fact that clearly something is going on here.
REEVE (voiceover): That boom was an incendiary device set off outside the building according to a university statement. No one was injured but some buildings were temporarily shut down.
REEVE (on camera): Do you think the point of this debate is to try to convince people in this room or to convince people on the internet?
MINSKY: I think it’s both. I mean, look, all of the event is not to make some uneducated leftist kid, you know, feel like an idiot. So, I hope there’s leftist people here that ask questions opposing Knowles and are able to do so respectfully.
REEVE: So, the protesters burned Michael Knowles an effigy which is protected speech.
CLYMER: It is — I wonder that though.
REEVE: Why not?
CLYMER: It’s too violent, it’s too aggressive, in fact it’s counterproductive. Because what they do is they take an image of that, they spread it online, and they say, see. This is what the movement is trying to do. They are going to burn anyone an effigy who disagrees with them.
https://www.mediaite.com/news/watch-stunning-moment-incendiary-device-goes-off-as-cnns-elle-reeve-confronts-gop-student-over-anti-trans-speaker/
>https://twitter.com/PaulHook_em/status/1653088746424746002
Was he trying to be MR PIG??
>pidgen toed
Around here we call it Dick Toed. Nothing pedo about it i don't think. just a girl looking for dick
If you look how Freemasons and their women stand. The men have their feet out open 90 degrees and the women are straight parallel to fit inside the square.
Isn't that the guy from It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia?>>18783283
The Rothschild tree, Did they only list Boys to keep it neat? Was it luck it was all boys? Did they eat the girls?
>The Rothschild tree, Did they only list Boys to keep it neat? Was it luck it was all boys? Did they eat the girls?
Never mind I took the time to dig just a min, he had 9 children
I remember watching these Juvenile Delinquent videos, or Boys Beware of creepy men videos