Anonymous ID: 579a54 May 2, 2023, 8:44 p.m. No.18788789   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8844

>>18788733

>Tucker suddenly wants to ask questions about Tower 7 collapsing

Anon wants to know if the window washers were interviewed. They were up on the far side of 7 that morning. Took around 15 years after 9/11 before anon even saw one, and only one, photo from that morning that shows them a little over halfway up on the face of the building on the window washing cable platform. They may or may not have seen anything. But they damn sure heard it, felt it, and saw the explosion(s) (if only reflected). Can find no mention of them anywhere other than the one photo whose caption seemed not to even acknowledge that they were there. Shoulda capped that one. Was pretty bad about documenting my digs back then.

Anonymous ID: 579a54 May 2, 2023, 8:58 p.m. No.18788837   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8876 >>8989

>>18788798

>someone who believes in the Time Travels pretty much eats de Smith Mundt Balls of Sheet.

 

The Hafeleโ€“Keating experiment was a test of the theory of relativity. In 1971,[1] Joseph C. Hafele, a physicist, and Richard E. Keating, an astronomer, took four cesium-beam atomic clocks aboard commercial airliners. They flew twice around the world, first eastward, then westward, and compared the clocks against others that remained at the United States Naval Observatory. When reunited, the three sets of clocks were found to disagree with one another, and their differences were consistent with the predictions of special and general relativity.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hafele%E2%80%93Keating_experiment

Anonymous ID: 579a54 May 2, 2023, 9:21 p.m. No.18788932   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>18788860

>The whole goddamn place was a ghosttown

Assuming they started to get off the platform once the first plane hit. Went to the roof? That's usually where they get on and off, correct? Maybe they had a front row seat for the second plane? Or maybe they had something to do with 7 coming down much later that day. Maybe that's why we don't see any interviews or hear any mention of them. I saw the photo and it was presented as having been taken the morning of. It just bothers me it's never been covered.

Anonymous ID: 579a54 May 2, 2023, 9:42 p.m. No.18789014   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9042

>>18788989

>WTAF are you doing here sperging half-assed opinions on a subject for which you lack the basic requisite competence?

 

So you don't think time travel is possible? That was the basic question. All I did was post one thing that makes me think it might be. I didn't say that what I was posting was the end all be all on the subject. You conflated that. I'm no scientist, but I know what I believe might be possible. Or at least should not be ruled out. Is that enough sperg for ya?