ffs, it's from 14 DEC 2018
>their differences were consistent with the predictions of special and general relativity.
that does NOT PROVE general relativity. there are several CRITICAL implicit assumptions that have NEVER been proven, the most fundamental being that the physical processes upon which caesium clocks operate are invariant under all conditions and in all places. that is UNTESTABLE given current technology.
therefore, there are OTHER explanations that make general relativity quite unnecessary.
perhaps caesium atom vibrations vary with cosmic ray flux, or the strength of the gravitational/inertial field, or some as yet unrecognized connection to their local environment, or even some unknown, undetected influence.
furthermore, relativity requires that all motion is RELATIVE, so if A and B accelerate relative to one another the clocks on EACH appear to go slower to the other. this is NOT what happens with GPS satellites, a fact well known to the engineers who build and maintain them, but conveniently ignored by mathematicians busy with dark matter and dark energy and other sci-fi fantasy topics better suited to hollyweird movies.
i suggest you read "Old Physics For New" by Thomas E. Phipps (of the Naval Research Labs) wherein he explicitly demonstrates the mathematical errors in GRT, starting with the fact that einstein used maxwell's equations, which are WRONG instead of Heinrich Hertz's corrected equations.
warning: you have to be competent in calculus to fully understand Phipps. but if you're not, then WTAF are you doing here sperging half-assed opinions on a subject for which you lack the basic requisite competence?
999999
>but I know what I believe
read that over and over, as many times as it takes, until you to realize just how retarded it is.
to respond to you question… i never say anything is impossible, but given what is known today, time travel is not possible.
classic argument: if it were, it will eventually be discovered, and we would be overrun with tourists from the future. we aren't, so it isn't. QED.
>So how does one explain having dreams of certain things and then a week later that dream plays out perfectly?
you're conflating the physical universe with the non-physical.
the physical universe must be consistent with physical laws.
that does NOT preclude the possibility of other realms of existence/awareness that transcend the physical universe.
in some other non-physical universe, i might be possible to peek into the future or the past, but that does not change the laws of physics here.
your physical being cannot travel in time. your consciousness transcends your physical being and the physical universe, so physical laws do not apply.
you are NOT your body. that is easily demonstrated. matter is made of atoms. if you put a 2023 penny and a 2022 penny in a piggy bank and leave them there for a million yrs, the atoms that were in the 2023 will still all be in the 2023, and likewise for the 2022.
your physical body is made of atoms. but unlike pennies, EVERY atom from which you body is built will be GONE in seven years. some, much sooner. they will be replaced with DIFFERENT atoms of the same element. you will have an entirely new and different physical body, but (((YOU))) will still be (((YOU))). ergo, (((YOU))) are NOT your physical body. that's why your consciousness has powers and abilities that transcend mere physical laws. but those laws always apply to physical objects.
K THEN?
>So time travel is possible then just not in the psyical sense.
if you can master OOBE's (out-of-body-experiences).
everyone has them while they're asleep. most are never aware of them.
when you can consciously enter the OOBE state at will, and control your journeys, you will have taken the first step to becoming an ascended master.
read the "journeys" trilogy by Robert Monroe.
journeys out of the body
far journeys
the ultimate journey
then read the collected works of Carlos Castañeda, T. Lobsang Rampa, and the genuine Seth material by Jane Roberts.
ignore this asshat, demoralization shill, and/or bot.
yup. habbened a while back.
>Haha that's what I said in the beginning didn't I.
NOPE. not at all what you said.
>Block me
why would i block you when your pathetic fails are so entertaining?
>if it Triggers your Qtard ass.
i'm not triggered, but it seems (You) are.
choke on a spurious voltage transient, you retarded chatbot.
nik'd
>ARE (You) TRYING TO TELL US THAT PLANES HIT THE OTHER BUILDINGS??!
seems very unlikely that there were no copies, physical and/or digital, that were stored in other locations. just sayin'…..
>What if the goal of the two towers collapse was to explain away bldng 7?
the goal of the towers' collapse was to turn a trillion dollar asbestos liability into a $226 billion dollar check from the insurance company.
fucking DUH!
>>18789248
>He happened to have a personal film camera (rare in those days), and
HORSESHIT. we were POOR. my sister bought a used Super8 camera as soon as she graduated highschool ('59) and got her first job.
>masonic psyop
that would be (((YOU)))
the still is a single frame from a motion picture of a man going thru all kinds of contortions.
no… you tagged it right. comped baker/BV deleting posts of truth.
>can not debate low IQ sub humans
sure you can… i'll go slow for you, so you can keep up. and i'll use crayons.
that's a plant. no way did that engine fall 80+ stories and NOT shatter the sidewalk. F&G.