My prediction, Q posts in 2 minutes, confirms seconds matter in time stamp.

Or at 10:07.

>>1879683

Or whatever time 8:08 is in Q time. I think maybe 9:08 EST.

>>1879706

Yep. SEC TEST. It was right in our faces. If you look at the early ones I’d wonder what the probability is of them repeating so few times. They almost never do for the first bunch of Q posts.

>>1879740

These are awesome. Look like something from a mystery novel.

>>1879746

Kek 8:08 is what I was looking for. Or 10:07. I think that’s actually 9:08 EST. Prime time, not stepping on Hannity on a weekend. Either way I hope he confirms some Qlock stuff.

>>1879750

I’m thinking so. Some failed too so we should be able to decipher what Q was aiming at once we work through making the web.

I woke up from a dream/vision a while back whilst obsessing over the time stamps and remembered “Just draw simple shapes.”

When you start connecting posts from their position on clock by date to the position on clock the seconds hand points to, shapes start to emerge organized by post topic.

It’s easy for anyone to do. Find any Q post, draw a line from the date it’s posted to the seconds time stamp on Qlock. Repeat and look for shapes.

Also helps to organize on Qmap by tag and use those. Increases likelihood you’ll be connecting posts that are in the same “shape.”

>>1879799

What he said. Q never confirmed it was security test. Also if seconds matter, which they do, how is that even a stretch?

>>1879823