TY Baker for your service,
o7.
post twice, NEVER notabled
Bill Gates funds millions to NGO claiming kids born sexual, 10-year-olds should learn about 'commercial sex work'
April 17, 2023
''The sex ed said kids under 10 should learn, 'As you grow up, you might start to be interested in people with diverse gender identities'''
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation donates millions annually to a nongovernmental organization which claims that children are born sexual and should learn about "commercial sex work" under 10 years of age.
The International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF)- a separate entity from the U.S. nonprofit - wields significant influence on global sex education. The NGO comprises 120 independent organizations in over 146 countries and has received - including its European network - over$80M from Gates. Other significant donors included the World Health Organization.
A toolkit released in 2017 showed an insight into how the NGO teaches sex education to children around the globe.
"Sexual activity may be part of different types of relationships, including dating, marriage or commercial sex work, among others," IPPF said about children under 10 should be taught, which was first flagged by Nicole Solas of the Independent Women's Forum.
Children under 10 should also be told "As you grow up, you might start to be interested in people with diverse gender identities," the toolkit said.
The IPPF suggested in multiple instances that children are born sexual.
Children under 10 should be taught that "Sexuality is a part of you from the moment you are born. Your sexuality develops and changes throughout your life."
"[S]ex positivity acknowledges that human beings, including adolescents and young people, are autonomous sexual beings."
Sex educators, according to the NGO, should have an "Understanding of young people as sexual beings."
https://www.foxnews.com/media/gates-funded-ngo-claims-children-born-sexual-10-year-olds-should-learn-about-commercial-sex-work
hello naker baker, kek.
https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2015/11/30/my-story-fiona-barnett-hang-on-for-the-ride/
>notable
do not agree
not notable
no real sauce, just a claim
Right.
Showed to a friend, who says the drawings look like they were done by a grownup not a child.
kek.
Ten key unproven—or disproven—assumptions underlying the practice of youth transitions
https://segm.org/current-concerns-gender-affirming-therapy-adolescents
April 18, 2023
The authors note that while a “growing number of European countries recognized deficiencies in the evidence supporting the highly medicalized “gender-affirming” approach to treating gender-dysphoric youth in North America, the narrative that “gender-affirmative care has been scientifically proven” has been remarkably resilient."
The authors observe that the practice of “gender affirmation” of minors using hormones and surgery is based on 10 key fallacious assumptions that are misrepresented as proven facts:
1 The emergence of a trans identity is the result of reaching a higher level of self-awareness.
2 Whether the trans-identity emerges in very young children, older children, teens, or mature adults, it is authentic and will be lifelong.
3 All gender identity variations are biologically determined and inherently healthy.
4 The frequently co-occurring psychiatric symptoms are a direct result of gender incongruence (the so-called “minority stress” model).
5 The only way to relieve, or prevent, psychiatric problems is to alter the body at the earliest signs of puberty.
6 Psychological evaluations and attempts to address psychiatric comorbidities should only be used to support transition.
7 Attempts to resolve gender dysphoria with psychotherapy range from ineffective to harmful.
8 Gender-dysphoric youth must have unquestioning social, hormonal, and surgical support for their current gender identities and desired physical appearance.
9 All individual embodiment goals, even those that do not occur in nature, must be fulfilled to the full extent technically possible.
10 Science has proven the benefits of early gender transition, and low rates of regret and detransition further validate the practice.
The authors refute these assumptions, focusing on the three most critical fallacies.
They recount the evidence that identity formation in adolescence is far from complete, and a trans identity for many will prove to be temporary. They note that the rationale for “gender-affirming” interventions has shifted from reducing extreme suffering, to merely fulfilling individual embodiment goals, which undermines the original premise of administering drastic, irreversible interventions off-label to young people whose identities are far from fully formed.
Finally, the authors note thatthe claim that gender-transition is a proven net-beneficial practice is demonstrably false. The claims by gender medicine clinicians that these interventions are “proven” collapse when scrutinized through the lens of systematic reviews, which are a fundamental requirement of evidence-based medicine. Unlike “narrative reviews” which the field has come to rely on, and which cherry-pick “favorite” studies and merely restate those studies' biased conclusions, systematic reviews require the analysis of all the available evidence, subjecting each study to a critical appraisal for risk of bias and other methodological problems, issuing an overarching conclusion which states the effects of a given treatment, and grades evidence for quality/certainty.
To date, every systematic review of evidence has concluded that the evidence of benefits is highly uncertain. The only disagreement is about the harms: some consider the harms also uncertain, while others note that the evidence of potential harms to bone and cardiovascular health, and the expected infertility and sterility, render the practice net-harmful for most youth today.
Can you add the original Gates article to which the followup refers?
>>18799579 , >>18799607 Gates & the IPPF: Global Health Fraud thread