Anonymous ID: 9ed150 May 5, 2023, 8:16 p.m. No.18803714   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3718

>>18803703

https://centerforaninformedamerica.com/moondoggie/

 

WAGGING THE MOONDOGGIE: PART I

WAGGING THE MOONDOGGIE: PART II

WAGGING THE MOONDOGGIE: PART III

WAGGING THE MOONDOGGIE: PART IV

WAGGING THE MOONDOGGIE: PART V

WAGGING THE MOONDOGGIE: PART VI

WAGGING THE MOONDOGGIE: PART VII

WAGGING THE MOONDOGGIE: PART VIII

WAGGING THE MOONDOGGIE: PART IX

WAGGING THE MOONDOGGIE: PART X

WAGGING THE MOONDOGGIE: PART XI

WAGGING THE MOONDOGGIE: PART XII

WAGGING THE MOONDOGGIE: PART XIII

WAGGING THE MOONDOGGIE: PART XIV

 

The definitive take down of the lie that is NASA and the faked moon landings.

Anonymous ID: 9ed150 May 5, 2023, 9:10 p.m. No.18803873   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3878 >>3880 >>3925

>>18803800

You realize that when you see a color what you're seeing is the spectrum of light that's reflected off whatever you're looking at? Trees aren't technically green, they are absorbing all the spectrum of light except green, which is reflected. But you wouldn't be able to see the green except the atmosphere is acting as a filter and defracting the green off of trillions and trillions (and moar) of atoms providing a medium being "painted" green. In space and on the moon there isn't any atmospheric medium to "paint" so all you see is blackness. You eyes will still be bombarded by all sorts of electromagnetic waves that may be detectable on some level, your eyes acting as a very weak medium, and could also burn the fuck out of your retinas.

Anonymous ID: 9ed150 May 5, 2023, 9:25 p.m. No.18803926   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3928

>>18803899

I only called you a brainiac, which I suppose would only offend if you're not one. please excuse my attempt to enlighten, I know it was wasted on you but you're not the only one reading these. Thanks for the (you)'s, it allowed my small spark of wisdom the chance to catch hold of some other curious mind.