"New York Jury Finds Trump Not Guilty of Rape, But Guilty of Defaming His Accuser by Denying It"
doesn't even make sense
How could you be guilty of denying something of which you're found "not guilty"?
>New York Jury Finds Trump Not Guilty of Rape, But Guilty of Defaming His Accuser by Denying It
just came out a few days ago (check qresear.ch?) that the tests themselves were "unsafe" . That was suspected by "conspiracy theorists" for years because of whistleblower reports.
"Cover up worse than crime"
is the fake-news drum beat used when they needed Nixon to step down.
There was no crime so the fake news had to focus on "It's the cover-up"
BUT THINK
there was no underlying crime.
Subversion of Justice via Media Propaganda / manipulation is ancient. anon was still young then. Seen 'it.
With Trump they try to make-out that he's just a massive criminal; when there's no evidence, what then? Just a lot of hand-waving, mis-direction, and repetition.
FLUFF
That's also "ancient" in the news business.
They just spin columns of bullshit, for something that could be said in one line.
Biden's case?
The only reason you'd go after the cover-up in Biden's case is when there's massive evidence of TREASON - and you're hoping "cover-up" doesn't mean death penalty; you'll soften the blow of the real crimes (in his case) and make-out it's more just an Administration detail, just a technical error.
people who don't follow politcs much are unaware of Biden's crimes; they just think he looks weird. yeah, like a psycho.
it-girl's mini is higher than the others.
if they get criminal charges to stick on Santos, does that mean House changes hands and investigations end?
I thought Constitution barred that.
Congresspeople are supposedly immune? Isn't that what allegedly save Pelosi and Shify's ass all these years?
she's a private citizen now? Works for a law firm; Boie? Same ol crowd of crooks?
She looks a bit as though she could be a torturer, as rumored.