>Qs abbreviations DO NOT CHANGE
>>343065
>Double meanings work well against sniffers.
>Q
>>1434041
>…
>Double meanings exist.
>…
>Q
Also wait
>pastebin.com/UhK5tkgb
(you)r link
>BO - Barack Obama also Board Owner
>AS - Adam Schiff also Antonin Scalia
>*CS - Chuck Schumer also Civil Service
>EMS - Emergency Messaging System also Emergency Medical Services
>JK - John Kerry also Jared Kushner
>[more]
Who is paying (you)?
>but the R post is just a post made by an anonymous troll
How do you know?
>You can't take
He can do whatever the fuck he wants.
I can also do whatever the fuck I want.
>fit your psyop
How do you know?
And now it's a psyop of one of the digging anons in here? top kek
How the fuck do you know?
>intentionally ignoring Q.
Has Q confirmed this post to be fake?
Would be simple for him to do.
Did he?
Are you Q?
How do you know what we are doing?
Maybe we simply dig on both?
Have you considered that?
Got a problem with that?
>shouldn't be on the Qresearch boards
>You should take your ignoring of Q
You aren't the BO.
You also aren't Q.
You see, your stupid posts, that scream shill, actually make me want to dig further and further on this.
>learn to Q
Yes, anons are exactly doing that. Also in here.
Question everything
And you want to stop us somehow, although you have no credentials at all.
You are still not board owner.
Upgrade to board owner, and then come back.
You know that board owner allowed and still allows this bread?
Why do you waste our bread?
Why are you going against what board owner allows?
>Q confirms
Yes, Q would surely simply tell us
JFK Jr is actually alive, guys.
Confirm R post as legit.
What's the big deal.
You know, Q actually even taught us to not even follow him blindly. See his antifa flag, which was actually photoshopped.
When I saw this, I actually looked it up and couldn't find it anywhere.
And I was not woke enough to post "wait, Q, I can't find your antifa flag anywhere. What's going on?".
I should have done that back then.
I'm sure he would have liked that.
>I have more credentials
No, you have as much credentials as any other anon on here including "R".
Well, R and most anons don't act like a shill, so actually you have less credentials.
You know this
>muh conspiracy theory
doesn't work on here. It does the exact opposite. Now go back to your owners and tell them what I told you.
So you know that R will never post again?
You got a time machine?
Remember Q even started as a plain anon.
And now
GTFO
I wasted enough time on (you).
Q+ posts:
Feb 18 1 posts
Mar 10 1 post
Apr 5 1 post
Apr 6 1 post
Apr 29 2 posts
May 10 1 post
May 13 1 post
Jun 12 1 post
Jun 13 1 post
Jun 20 1 post
Strangely qanon.pub finds a few more, may be a bug.
Did Q ever say that the plan started when Trump went for president?
I don't remember.
Trump posted tons of crumbs years before so that we can find all of those crumbs now.
Trump already knew back then.
Trump must have been connected back then already.
See for example tweet in 2013:
>How amazing, the State Health Director who verified copies of Obama’s “birth certificate” died in plane crash today. All others lived
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/411247268763676673
I wondered why (((they))) would film that and then release it to the press. Wouldn't make sense.
What if this was another part of the plan to get that witness protected and out? Filming it would make way more sense. And thus Trump tweeted about it to put another crumb down for us to collect in 2018.
Trump was in it back then already.
No coincidences.
Hmmm
May 13th
>1394124
>We fight every sigle day on behalf of you
"n" missing
coincidence? Typo?
Yes.
But
Which start?
Started planning?
Starting the execution of the plan?
1999/2000 was the first time Trump at least somewhat tried to go for president, right?
So maybe the execution of the original plan?
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/presidential-campaign/256159-a-look-back-at-trumps-first-run
>"In the end, Trump quit the race because he concluded that the Reform Party was self-destructing and could not provide the "support a candidate needs to win." (This was his quote in a press release and later on TV).
>He also said that since Ventura, his ally, had left the party, the Reform Party was being taken over by Buchanan.
>
>He also said, in regards to running again, that "in a number of years, I might consider it" — so we were warned!
http://www.tvguide.com/news/donald-trump-presidential-campaign-timeline/
2008 isn't mentioned there, but here on fox:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/2006/01/03/trump-no-governor-but-maybe-presiden-53392630.html
>Trump, in a phone call to The Post from his oceanside Palm Beach estate, Mar-a-Lago, declared, "I'm not going to run for governor because I'm having too much fun doing what I'm doing now.
>But a political figure close to Trump told The Post, "Donald is definitely interested in running for president in 2008, possibly as an independent candidate."
a political figure, great. Names, names!
>Trump also said there's a chance he could support Democrat Attorney General Eliot Spitzer for governor, saying, "He's done an amazing job."
Was a rhetorical question kek
I couldn't find any more typos, but who knows, maybe I missed one.
>could also be demons if they exist
I saw this video about NASA some weeks ago.
This part somewhat burned itself into my brain.
youtube.com/watch?v=qGiuObmG1k8&t=16m1s
I guess I should dig up the original video and confirm this mirror reflection.
What the hell is this