>>18839991

Fuck that stupid clock. It's pure schizo. It has never been endorsed now matter how much your twist and stretch and bend to convince yourself that it was.

See how SMALL that original clock is? Compare that to today. At some point ALL THINGS will line up as a matter of simple mathematics. This doesn't prove anything other than with an infinite sample size, eventually everything will eventually line up.

So a misunderstanding ultra-over interpretations of a single statement to "wind the clock" became an infinitely growing diagram. Combine that with a lack of understanding about how math and probability works and you have the Q-clock, which is peak schizo cringe.

>>18839991

The odds of something lining up on one spoke is 1 in 60. But anons will draw the line all the way across means it's only 1 in 30. And apparently you can zig-zag right or left as well which takes you down to about 1 in 20.

"What are the odds?"

1 in 20. That's not too bad really. And show this clock doesn't prove anything at all, other than your lack of understanding about math and probability. But you won't drop it, you'll keep on keeping on in your ignorance.

Steal this post, adopt and use it if you hate the Q-clock as much as I do.

>>18840590

Holy shit you can barely speak coherently in English. You really burned me bro, ouch.

>>18840600

1 in 20 proves nothing. "Graphics" does not mean your schizo clock.