Anonymous ID: 3aef47 May 14, 2023, 5:44 a.m. No.18844898   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18844589

My deepest sympathies, anon. If not for the love of many a good animal over the years, I’m not sure I would have lasted as long as I have in this wretched world. They do make the insanity of it all somewhat bearable. May you and yours find some joy in the memories of your 13 years together as you move through the mourning process to come.

Anonymous ID: 3aef47 May 14, 2023, 6:17 a.m. No.18845017   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5023

>>18844978

So you’re saying Ben’s Suspicious Observer channel is suspicious? Sure seems to make good sense and really tie the room together with what he’s offering. But you are yelling in all caps. There is that. So maybe I should beliebe you.

Anonymous ID: 3aef47 May 14, 2023, 6:24 a.m. No.18845040   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5042 >>5109

>>18845023

So just to be clear, all the science being offered on that channel should be disregarded? I think I’ve heard him address the specific topic you address but not sure which vid I heard it in. Have admittedly just started diving into the channel/topic. But he did offer a reasonable, or what seemed reasonable, debunk to the circling pole theory in something I listened to recently. Not a physicist/scientist, though. So, I’m not putting muh eggs in either basket just yet.

Anonymous ID: 3aef47 May 14, 2023, 6:31 a.m. No.18845058   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5146

>>18845042

This one. His vids get posted here from time to time. Fairly well known “earth’s gonna flip” catastrophist. Figured you would know about him since you are railing in all caps against the theory he espouses.

Anonymous ID: 3aef47 May 14, 2023, 6:55 a.m. No.18845141   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5186

>>18845109

Ya, I def lean towards Ben being correct and also an anon. He makes good sense and backs his shit up with solid arguments. Have been aware of him for a long while but just started diving deep into his work in recent days. The fact the CIA classified the Chan Thomas shit and then released an edited version for public consumption says a lot. And like I said earlier, the theory ties much together whether looking at it from a scientific, religious, or historical perspective.

Anonymous ID: 3aef47 May 14, 2023, 7:03 a.m. No.18845159   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5167

>>18845146

I’ve made zero claims other than the guy makes intuitive sense when elucidating his research and claims. But you did state your initial argument in all caps which is the sauciest of all sauces. So now I’m just so conflicted on what to think. What do?! What do?!

Anonymous ID: 3aef47 May 14, 2023, 7:17 a.m. No.18845193   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18845167

I subscribe to the philosophy of hope for the best, prepare for the worst. And, better to have and not need than need and not have. Given that literally everything feels like a psyop at this point, all I can do is keep my head down, work hard, treat people well, and do my best to discern truth as challenging as all of that is in this day and age. And nothing Ben and the science he is presenting evidence for conflicts with any of that. So, I see no reason to throw the baby out with the bath water just yet.

Anonymous ID: 3aef47 May 14, 2023, 7:24 a.m. No.18845207   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5231

>>18845186

That is a very interesting theory, anon. I guess it depends on whether or not the claims that we are receiving the worst of the worst rather than good hearted folks just looking for a better life are true or not before I would buy into something like that.