Anonymous ID: 7b5b5e May 14, 2023, 8:11 p.m. No.18848629   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8654

>>18848292 (lb)

>Artificial Intelligence being discussed in 1964 among spy agencies?

also remember, the supposed "moon landing" wouldn't happen until 5 years later

this type of capability is equivalent to us discussing some sort of tech that shouldn't even be fathomable to exist yet

I personally believe "AI" has been around for a long time and is slowly being released….it's not an "alien invasion" everyone should be worried about, it's the "AI alien invasion"

and does the "A" in AI actually stand for "Artificial"…"Alien" or both?

Anonymous ID: 7b5b5e May 14, 2023, 8:15 p.m. No.18848650   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8812 >>8965 >>8977 >>9078 >>9132 >>9194 >>9201

DENDRAL artificial intelligence program (1965)

 

A Stanford team led by professors Ed Feigenbaum, Joshua Lederberg and Carl Djerassi creates DENDRAL, the first “expert system.” DENDRAL was an artificial intelligence program designed to apply the accumulated expertise of specialists to problem solving. Its area of specialization was chemistry and physics. It applied a battery of "if-then" rules to identify the molecular structure of organic compounds, in some cases more accurately than experts.

 

https://www.computerhistory.org/timeline/1965/

Anonymous ID: 7b5b5e May 14, 2023, 8:18 p.m. No.18848666   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8701 >>8812 >>8965 >>9078 >>9132 >>9194 >>9201

Alan Turing quoted by The London Times on artificial intelligence

 

On June 11 (1949) The London Times quotes the mathematician Alan Turing. “I do not see why it (the machine) should not enter any one of the fields normally covered by the human intellect, and eventually compete on equal terms. I do not think you even draw the line about sonnets, though the comparison is perhaps a little bit unfair because a sonnet written by a machine will be better appreciated by another machine.”

 

https://www.computerhistory.org/timeline/1949/#169ebbe2ad45559efbc6eb35720709ae

Anonymous ID: 7b5b5e May 14, 2023, 8:28 p.m. No.18848713   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18848701

>Can the AI successfully imitate a human?

that's the point

Discussing this stuff at the time when it was considered science fiction and then look at us now, who really knows how far they've actually gone.