This anon raises 2 important points.
1) The first issue is about accessibility of ideas to "normies"and newfags.
If the ideas are confusing don't expect those who are less questioning to invest their time and energy into finding out more. It will simply reinforce pre-existing prejudices.
Remember this is a battle for hearts and minds, not an ego-contest.
2) I think there is a risk that people can spend too long watching and waiting for the next crumb and neglecting other things they could be doing. The psychologist would probably not be doing their job if they had a concern about the anons focus if their patient had become totally consumed.
We can disagree that it is a conspiracy fantasy of course but we should also pause a moment to consider what is this focus of attention really giving us.
I think one of the good things about the community is the development of humour and light hearted memes to alleviate the sometimes dire and depressing content of qResearch.
The post by anon "R" makes similar points. Do we really want to be like the (((bastards))) we are opposing, because if we behave like (((them))) we gain nothing.