automatic badger-botics violate the rights of those who seek to use a free speech board by jamming the channel with nonsense.
This is suppression of free speech.
we notice a difference between the BV.
some of them are deleting posts that are obvious spam.
they do it silently and they don't brag about it.
others jump to it when there is abomination porn in the bread.
quickly those posts are removed.
and then we have the board Soros who finds someone who is having a bad hair day and complaining about things, and posts some bullshit, perhaps, complaining. Nothing immoral, maybe tasteless, but it's just someone venting.
and then the board Soros will delete all of their posts.
bu board Soros doesn't just delete the posts he brags about it.
and if you say anything board Soros has a cheering gallery who says "i love to kissy kissy the board Soros, he is so heroic"
one might conclude this is just the same person having IP hopped.
when I notice some BV and who they delete I say 'huh, I already filtered that one', for example in this bread it was the one who does the fake-history of religion in Tor posts.
so when it's deleted, I understand.
I wish it wouldn't have to be that way, but the one doing it doesn't do at deviant 'Ha Ha' post, but just works silently.
and so it's a lot less offensive.
if the board Soros wasn't just a jerk about it, and deleing people who are merely having a bad day, and wish the board were as it was, an actual place where you could post without worrying about someone deleting you just because they can, you really have to say: why does the board Soros still have his BV position?
can it not be removed from him? He's abused it over and over and over, and always boasts about it.
and he seems to be the only BV he does brag with a Ha Ha.
a tor poster with hateful copy pasta, I get it why they delete that.
It would fill the board with stuff that everyone else has to thus filter.
but the Board Soros, he does it just to be a dominant as if he is the voice of this place.
so that's me venting.
carry on.
all that means is that they transfer all the content to some new owner and renege on their obligations.
it consolidates it to a more centralized management.
the content will still all be owned by censorious people.
https://www.sparknotes.com/philosophy/augustine/section2/
in City of God, St Augustine discusses the sack of Rome and argues against the pagan idea that it was Christianity that made Rome get sacked.
in this brief, linked, there is a gloss as to what Augustine argued in these volumes.
all of you opining about the collapse of Rome would do well to read through this brief, or better yet read the full text of Augustine work from some other source.
this is an example of the deviancy that shills bring to this board, trying to subvert it.
when one analyizes these creatures with psychology, which is what they are most likely trained in, they don't like being reminded that they are degenerates and anti-social, and do not have anything to bring to the board but their training methods and psyoperational psycholical mind games.
they are failures but they are kept-creatures who are paid to be here to disrupt using what are called 'effective methods' by those who feed them with the raw-meat of hatred and degenerate memes.
these people will either reform or end up sad victims of their own efforts.
all it has, aside from the realization that I am correct in calling it a degenerate, and anti-social, are name calling and mind-games.
it could resign and do something else, but it has itches it needs to scratch, so it probably needs the pay check.
they have nothing.
they are only here to cause havoc.
when you explain what they are and why they do it they seem impotent and pathetic.
they pretend that the citizen shill splaining is a 'paid shill'.
a used copy of a text book on psychology at a thrift store explains them perfectly in the parts about petulant children and deviant teenagers.