>>1886116

>Why are only female members of Trumps team being stalked and harassed?

We need to exploit this more effectively. Oh yeah, add Pam Bondi to the list.

We need to know what other business's the owners of the Red Hen and MXDC Cochina have and examine them for discrimination against women, a crime.

Do they have an equal number of illegal women as men working in their restaurants?

Do they preferentially seat men in better locations in their restaurants?

Do men get better service than women in their restaurants because men tip better?

Are the triggered "gays" in their restaurants homosexual men? Or lesbian women?

>>1886289

>Rules for radicals: "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it."

We can do that too. These are democrats that are discriminating against women. Indeed, the new democrat paradigm is to TARGET WOMEN who are conservatives.

Just like when they were silent on slick willie's rapes and sexual assaults, the democrat's rule of discrimination against women when it suits their totalitarian agenda makes them vulnerable to exposure and ridicule.

We need to meme the shit out of this.

>>1886362

>what are we going to do about it?

Why nothing, of course. Let them waste their time, money, and effort to no effect. Don't respond, just ignore them.

In a war of attrition, why discourage your enemies from frittering away their resources?

Shilling actually benefits us as we can judge where they are feeling most vulnerable and willing to devote resources. We can then troll them into wasting even more of their treasure.

We're kind of like a boat. "A hole in the water into which you pour money".