>>1885837 (prev bread)
<anon requests feedback on baking instructions
The bit about handing off should mimic military comms.
like when you do a radio check, the initiator ends the comm:
current baker states they need a handoff
Baker requests hand off
new baker responds
new baker requesting hand off
current baker responds
baker handing off requests confirmation
new baker
handoff confirmed
old baker
handoff confirmed
Basically its a redundancy to make sure
the new baker confirms the handoff, and the old
baker confirms, this way there is zero chance
for confusion. The language i think is less important
than the idea that there is a challenge, and then
a response.
also in "what makes a good notable"
--->No sauce, No Notable
if you could add something in their about
how anons should report a notable so bakers
aren't spending their time reading the notable
while missing other notables (more important when
bread is being slid hard, or Qposts ect)
Baker notable
link to notable
breif description on why its notable
Instead of anons just writing
notable
and then baker has to go through 5 page infograph
trying to figure out what/why notable is notable.
it's not necessary to add info on how anons should
report notables, just think it might be a good idea
Great job Anon. Wish i had this months ago kek.