i've heard both. standing on line is antiquated, but it's not 'wrong' per se.
a parenthetical you can be photoshopped - but BO can compare hashes.
that's exactly my point.
i can "fake" a you in three minutes. i am not really the you in the pic.
someone is really trying to shout down the jfk jr. pic post, and anyone can claim ownership because that user-id only posted once in the thread.
as far as i'm concerned, it's legit until BO or Q says to drop it.
the you can be faked, or did i post your post too?
hey frendo.
no, the point is that the person who "claimed" the JFK Jr. pic isn't really offering proof.
any one of us can fake a you on a post, that's the only point i'm making.
ha!
you're missing the point! i'm not the shill, i'm trying to expose the id-hopping technique to legitimize the request for BO to investigate the ip hashes.
no worries. maybe i was too subtle in my attempt.
suspiciously missing two.
potter family farms is the 'parent' company of buffalo creek and donald's meats.
calixto ranch is a/k/a singing earth produce
i disagree. anyone can screenshot the original post and photoshop a you in there.
agree 100.
no reason to close our minds to anything at this point. we've been told to pray, watch, love, spread the message, dig, think…no division, no negativity.
peace, love, and hard thinking, anon.
no, it absolutely isn't.
the background of any screencapture of this board is simple and easy to duplicate.
there is nothing on a screencap of this board that cannot be simply/easily duplicated.
i've gotten it down to about 2.5 minutes in this thread. easy.
i agree with you - but i felt that i need to make it clear to as many anons as possible that a screencap of a 'you' for proof means absolutely zero. honestly trying to help by showing maybe-newer-than-mefags that a picture of a you is nothing.
i am not the original poster of this image. here's a highlighted you, with the search function visible.