>>1886571 (DaFuq is "R?")

From now on, I am going to "sign" my anonymous posts with, "I'm the Next Best Thing to Q," because I am an arrogant prick who thinks MY thoughts and ideas are superior to the rest of the weaker Anons (and I secretly think I'm better than Q, but can't say that yet).

FFS Anons! If she had not have signed the post with a random letter, you all would have just read the post, agreed, and moved on. There was nothing profound in her post. Nothing that Truthers weren't talking about for the past 100 years. A good reminder? Yes. But that's all. TOGTFO, "R."

BO, please change the Board name to Q AND R Research to stroke the ego.

Rant over. Sorry to slide, Anons.

>>1886847

Anon, I (partially) agree, but I think you might benoff just a bit. I did some serious research on this subject in college, and even Liberal psyche professors reluctantly agreed, based on research. This is what I ultimately decided, in a nutshell;

Not all children that were molested, end up homosexual. But, MANY homosexuals were molested in their psychosexual developmental years. I concluded that, if left to psychsexually develop in a relatively undisturbed, natural way, most humans develop heterosexually. But, when first experiences with sexual activity are with/by an adult, during that critical developmental period, it skews the development. Because there is less research into female adult perpetrators, most of my research was on adult male perpetrators. This is a socially-unacceptable (or denied) result, but most homosexual men were indeed sexually assaulted by adult (or at least older) males during psychosexual development.

This is the reason that I defend the claim that sexuality is NOT a choice. But that doesn't not mean that it wasn't influenced very early. It is also why I am not biased against someone based simply on their sexual preference. I truly believe that a person's sexual preference was set well before they even knew about sexuality. Most adults truly have no choice over their sexual preference.

Did that make sense?

>>1887154

This one is KEK, Anon. Love it