>>18867526 (pb)
the person who writes up these reports acts as if anyone discussing board issues is a dissenter and a shill, which is not true.
the board team aren't gods and they need to be held to account for the behavior of some of the crew.
the cheerleading section that pretends like board staff are angels is of no help to the board.
it's tiring to have to deal with it, the constant slander, the put downs, the personal attacks.
there are those who are always on the board and are all about conflict.
some people butt in to join in attacks of those who monitor and poke at the conflict teams.
it's not organic and it tells anon a lot about what is going on behind the scenes, those people who think that they are the voice of the board, they say 'we' and claim that all the censorship is OK, as if there is a consensus about it, which there never can be.
without criticism people don't know how they might improve their performance, and when people have legitimate complaints just calling them shills doesn't do anything but try to augment the conflict.
carry on.
and