Anonymous ID: 66e18a May 19, 2023, 8:53 p.m. No.18874912   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4979

UK'S DEARLOVE CONTINUING WITH REGIME CHANGE TALK ABOUT PUTIN. These old neocons are dangerous.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/ex-mi6-boss-says-only-a-revolution-will-end-the-threat-from-putins-russia/ar-AA1bh0wx

(Redacted just a bit.)

Only a revolution could end the threat from Vladimir Putin's Russia in the war in Ukraine and Britain has 'lost its way' since the end of the Cold War, a former head of MI6 has warned.

Sir Richard Dearlove, who led MI6 between 1999 and 2004, said Britain no longer had the 'cohesion and motivation' that drove the former spy when he joined the service in 1966.

He said that the nation has lost self-confidence without the 'essential threat' of the Cold War.

Discussing the war in Ukraine, Sir Richard said: 'The sheer brutality of Putin's regime leads me towards the conclusion that Russia's political DNA is so corrupted that only another revolutionary change might rebalance it.'

Sir Richard told the National Conservatism conference in Westminster: 'It never occurred to me that I was not on the side of the angels.'

He said: 'Looking back, we were self-confident without any hint of complacency. We took for granted the fundamental moral difference between the values we espoused and the totalitarian nature of Soviet Russia and Maoist China.'

Comparing his experience to the modern world, he said: 'It seems to me we have since lost our way.

'Without the essential threat to our way of life that was a constant feature of the Cold War, we have lost cohesion and motivation, and especially our self-confidence.

'Minority views amplified by social media have been allowed disproportionate political and social space so that the mainline political and social debate has become seriously distorted by fringe movements.'

Sir Richard appeared at the right-wing National Conservatism conference as part of a panel on 'national realism and foreign policy', alongside other speakers who claimed 'woke' movements had undermined security.

Discussing 'active measures' - disinformation and subversion efforts usually associated with Communist nations - Sir Richard warned: 'Active measures work best in a fertile social and political environment where naivety about Russian and Chinese intentions is rife, where doubt about our own values system and its foundations has irrational strength.

'I'm worried when I witness eminent members of our own elite doing the work of our foremost enemies for them.

'Whether it is advocating for Huawei, refusing to publish any serious scientific study that questions the Chinese narrative on the origins of the Sars-Cov 2 virus, or promoting a settlement in the war between Russia and Ukraine that ignores the peace conditions laid down by President Zelensky.'

Speaking on the One Decision podcast, which he co-hosts, in May last year, Sir Richard said of Putin: 'I think he'll be gone by 2023 - but probably into the sanatorium, from which he will not emerge as the leader of Russia.

'I'm not saying he won't emerge from the sanatorium, but he won't emerge as the leader of Russia any longer.'

'That's a way to sort of move things on without a coup,' he concluded.

Anonymous ID: 66e18a May 19, 2023, 9:27 p.m. No.18875006   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18874979

>essential threat' of the Cold War

They need us afraid. It's really horrific when he says the quiet parts out loud. Part of getting older I guess. And that part about

"Active measures work best in a fertile social and political environment where naivety about Russian and Chinese intentions is rife, where doubt about our own values system and its foundations has irrational strength," is absolute projection.

(He should have said the West's active measures…)

Anonymous ID: 66e18a May 19, 2023, 10:58 p.m. No.18875312   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5351 >>5405

>>18875145

My guess is that if the MONDAY reference is to the embedded Ytube video (preceding the Friday post), then the vid was likely from 4DEC2017. A reference to a vid from 12October would need a more precise 'point'. For example, if someone asks you on Friday when a certain vid was posted and you answer MONDAY, they would normally assume you meant the most recent MONDAY.