Anonymous ID: 1e1a03 May 20, 2023, 7:24 a.m. No.18876435   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18876412

KEK. No one believes them.

 

Prince Harry, Meghan Markle called out by Princess Diana's former bodyguard over alleged car chase

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/prince-harry-meghan-markle-called-182955348.html

Anonymous ID: 1e1a03 May 20, 2023, 7:27 a.m. No.18876448   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18876424

>Intruder got into Sullivan's Washington home during a night at the end of April

 

> Sullivan confronted the man who was 'intoxicated' and told him to leave

 

> NSA then went outside and told his Secret Service detail what had happened

 

Hum, kinda sounds like a Paul Pelosi situation.

Sullivan had a guy over and it went sideways.

"He was Invited it…"

Kinda like no one stole Intel, they were granted access…

Anonymous ID: 1e1a03 May 20, 2023, 8:15 a.m. No.18876631   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6660

>>18876614

>Behind the scenes

Yeah, Logical Thinking would inspire [you] to realize the question meant moar PUBLIC TRANSPARENCY was needed at this point.

 

Drive by Drops with [IT'S HABBENING] are not going to fly nemoar nowadaze.

Anonymous ID: 1e1a03 May 20, 2023, 8:29 a.m. No.18876693   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6716

>>18876660

>Patience. Enjoy the current show

 

No. We were told to be LOUD. BE HEARD. DEMAND PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY!

 

We were promised transparency. PUBLIC.

ENOUGH of the Patience shit. Seriously.

This entire shit show ALREADY TOOK PLACE.

Durhams "Report" that was just released publically, was already done. Where do you think the drops came from? How would they know? CONTROL. WHO HAS CONTROL???

Yeah. Pfffft. Overwhelm the normies? TOUGH LOVE ANON! TOUGH LOVE

Anonymous ID: 1e1a03 May 20, 2023, 8:46 a.m. No.18876763   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18876734

>I wonder if Zelensky works for the Rothschilds.

Central Casting

https://www.mandatory.com/culture/1587736-twitter-wants-jeremy-renner-to-play-ukrainian-president

Anonymous ID: 1e1a03 May 20, 2023, 9:36 a.m. No.18876973   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch calls COVID-19 response "the greatest intrusion on civil liberties in peacetime history"

 

In a statement, Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch made it clear where he stands on the pandemic-era emergency response.

 

Gorsuch called it "the greatest intrusion on civil liberties in the peacetime history of this country."

 

His statement came in response to a Republican-led effort to extend Title 42, a restrictive immigrant policy.

 

As COVID-19 spread across the United States in 2020, among the wide-ranging efforts to insulate the country from the pandemic was Title 42, a restrictive immigration policy allowing the rapid expulsion of asylum seekers and other migrants.

 

The measure — initially implemented by the Trump administration and expanded under President Joe Biden — expired this month. The US Supreme Court last week rejected a push by Republican-led states to keep it in place.

 

In an eight-page statement in response to the case, Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch didn't mince words. He called the country's response to the COVID-19 emergency "the greatest intrusion on civil liberties in the peacetime history of this country."

 

"Executive officials across the country issued emergency decrees on a breathtaking scale. Governors and local leaders imposed lockdown orders forcing people to remain in their homes. They shuttered businesses and schools, public and private, " Gorsuch wrote in the statement, released Thursday.

 

Gorsuch has long been critical of restrictive COVID-19 measures, the Associated Press reported. In January 2022, he was the only Justice who refused to wear a mask, forcing Justice Sonia Sotomayor to participate in oral arguments virtually. Sotomayor has diabetes and is at a higher risk of severe illness from COVID-19.

 

In Thursday's statement, Gorsuch warned that the "concentration of power in the hands of so few" won't lead to "sound government."

 

"One lesson might be this: Fear and the desire for safety are powerful forces. They can lead to a clamor for action —almost any action — as long as someone does something to address a perceived threat. A leader or an expert who claims he can fix everything, if only we do exactly as he says, can prove an irresistible force," he wrote.

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/supreme-court-justice-neil-gorsuch-141657699.html

Anonymous ID: 1e1a03 May 20, 2023, 10:45 a.m. No.18877177   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7187

>>18877148

>women who fuck men over (divorce rape for example) get rewarded by the system.

You're false theory is rooted clearly through personal warped views.

Section 8 isn't a reward.

Absent Fathers who refuse to take responsibility, by helping raise them, and dipping into the next pool of younger waters, hold the majority of the responsibility for a broken society and out of control children. Those same men, created "Women's Rights" to pretend to allow women onto the playing field, Then they ruined the traditional family life, hiding behind those same puppet women they pushed out front. (Same shit with race)

 

Men, decided who in society, would be allowed to participate. Remember that. Now you don't like the rules set forth? KEK!