Anonymous ID: 0904e4 May 21, 2023, 9:14 p.m. No.18884349   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4378

>>18884343

>>18884343

>No I'm not wrong, and when did I say we don't? You're arguing with what YOU think I believe, not what I actually believe. You're constantly projecting and completely closed minded to Truth or anything that goes against what YOU want to believe and what YOU think we believe.

 

Constantly projecting? I've messaged you twice lmao dumbass

 

Tell me your beliefs then

Anonymous ID: 0904e4 May 21, 2023, 9:25 p.m. No.18884394   🗄️.is 🔗kun

We have lost an entire generation. I just got done arguing with someone on facebook saying Disney needs to pay the workers a living wage

 

These young'ins act like the workers dont know the salary/wage when they apply for a job and get hired.

 

Its like, hey i want the job that pays x amount, then after I work here for awhile, im going to decide to stop working hard because i dont get paid enough.

Anonymous ID: 0904e4 May 21, 2023, 9:28 p.m. No.18884402   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4500

>>18884391

Makes me scared that we might not get all the stuff we want. ex: 9-11, Sandy Hook, MK Ultra induced shootings, poisoning of our food, etc

 

I worry a lot will quietly get fixed and we will never know

Anonymous ID: 0904e4 May 21, 2023, 9:49 p.m. No.18884477   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18884467

Yep my guess too. And I'd assume him and Chris were organizing this for awhile, getting enough evidence, putting it together, and figuring out who/where to drop it. Geffen got wind of it and ended it. Maybe they actually did threaten Geffen, or maybe Geffen just got word they were doing it. So sad. Makes ya wonder how many other suicides werent even suicides

Anonymous ID: 0904e4 May 21, 2023, 9:53 p.m. No.18884485   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4488 >>4489 >>4492 >>4506

Correct me if I'm wrong here, and good chance I'm wrong…

 

But there is one rule of law, and one rule of law only. It shouldnt matter if a Supreme Court justice is D or R, their job is to rule based on the fucking law, which there is only ONE law

 

So shouldnt every single Supreme Court vote be either 9-0 or 0-9? With maybe a rare exception of a 8-1 or 1-8 if one of them isnt familiar with a law

 

They fall back on this interpretation of the law when they want to ignore the law and protect their party, but interpretation of the law still isnt good enough. Law is law

Anonymous ID: 0904e4 May 21, 2023, 10:03 p.m. No.18884516   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18884506

>and unless you're a simple-minded simpleton, it shouldn't be too hard to imagine a case where there is some ambiguity in that regard. words are funny like that.

 

The SC is 6-3 R over D, with Roberts being a DS shill. Most votes are 5-4 with Roberts siding with D's. The condescending response is hardly necessary. My point was that if there is one rule of law, there shouldnt be so many cases that are 5-4 or 6-3. Dumbass