too callow to not be a bot?

is any real person so ridiculous as this one:

id: 2543cc

>18885140

> 2543cc

this one uses the C word which disqualifies it as a real person.

18885215

here is links a DTrump truth and gets put into notables. imagine that.

18885221 is a nonsense comment, feigned relazation about nonsense

18885298

use of term 'inbreeding', which is a tell of the shill bot from last Summer in 18885298, and images that are usesless and unrelated.

nonsense-bottic posts.

on this one it will not accept any guidence on how not to be ajerk 1885376

gives an atta-boy to someone, calling them a 'Patriot', which is more evidence of phoniness.

uses 'kek', which means it's a script of bot.

links in Q post about Roths and Holy see : evidence of the hate-bot that spams breads

in a jerky way appologizes for being a jerk: a clear tell of the midnight havoc bot.

makes a word-blather nonsense post without any meaning on this one: 18885407

posts generic pepe meme with nonsense, pretense to meaning wihtout any.

asks to notable 3 week old news on this one: 18885266

>>18885571

I posit that people who do that turret-syndrome word vomit nominative are trying to train people to talk like idiots and be unacceptible as candidates.

people who post that are either bots or anti-maga posting to make MAGA and Trump supporters look like idiots.

>>18885602

> debd3d

all this bot does is spam ineffective 'loath these people' memes.

>>18885412

I sometimes felt as though he was here in the early days as a persona to get haters to attack him.

His real person would say a lot of outragous stuff about Trump, and then it was like he lurked the board.

but there was no way to know it was him.

it was like "I'm testing you. If you hate me you are a hypocrite, and you must know this".

so even though his public persona was always 'Hate Maga, hate Trump' the person, who showed up here, as him, seemed to not be against people, but merely presenting a character, that was a public persona that could be thrown away.

so maybe now he's decided to drop that act and try to show himself as an authentic Christian?

>>18885672

do you mean by 'UK experts' UK warmongers?

>>18885680

later today, or tomorrow, a lot of people are going to be trying to get all those eights.

>>18885683

'accosted' means approached and violated suddenly

>>18885686

if they were engineering people, they'd engineer ones that wouldn't care if they were in a cage.

they aren't humans like you are, right?

so they'd have them be happy to do or be whatever was expected of them.

Do you really believe that government is engineering hybrids?

>>18885696

If you're going to do an analysis of Hollywood scripting of that era don't forget the made for TV movies got creepier and creepier as the decade progressed.

>>18885691

>>18885710

the narrative of blackmail?

hum

let me see.

just a quick point:

if A is blackmailing B

does B know that it's A who is doing the blackmail?

and that question needs to be part of it.

how effective would the blackmailer be if they let their victims know it was them who had set them up for the blackmail?

>>18885714

I asked a question that basically stated my point of view.

I do not believe that government is engineering hybrids.

>>18885732

He's an actor.

He got deep deep inside of Hollywood.

Of course he has to be the 'satanist' as a persona to be effective and get creepy people to reveal to them their deep and darkest secrets.

but the person, who is really is?

I remember hearing how when he did 'Man on the Moon' he got lost in the character of the person he was playing in that role (some guy who was lost in his own roles.)

and he was quoted as saying something about . . . how it made him question just what a person is, what a personality is . . .

and my take on it was 'well, the person is the one who chooses to do the role and decides to stay in character, and at any point during that ordeal he could have broken out of that, so, no, there is a real personality, and it's who decides what roles to play.

perhaps he did some things and then was tasked to be come the ultimate creep persona to draw out the real creeps.

he played a role. He kept in character.

and now he doesn't have to do it anymore.

I have a book about 'Saints' which explained who they were before they found Jesus Christ.

some of them were rather horrible people.

mass murderers, serial abusers, criminals.

>>18885760

my point was what said about 'the kids'

saying they were accosted doesn't mean 'swept under the rug'

you'd need a different verb for that.

that's all.

I wish I knew what it was to help you with your narrative. maybe something like 'the abused children were warehoused?'

anyway don't be angry at me.

be angry at those who would warehouse abused kids.

any dig on Microsoft, which has to be part of a dig on Bill Gates, should also include a dig on Paul Allen, who passed away some years back before things about governement were as obvious as they are now.

here is a Wikipedia link about this person whose trust fund still has a lot of capital and runs a lot of stuff:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Allen