Anonymous ID: fab0c0 May 22, 2023, 12:44 p.m. No.18887112   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7118 >>7159 >>7163

>>18887092

The Law of War manual is the only thing that makes sense to me about that. It marks time only in the sense of what occurs.

 

11.3 END OF OCCUPATION AND DURATION OF GC OBLIGATIONS

The status of belligerent occupation ends when the conditions for its application are no

longer met. Certain GC obligations with respect to occupied territory continue for the duration

of the occupation after the general close of military operations.

 

11.4 LEGAL POSITION OF THE OCCUPYING POWER

Military occupation of enemy territory involves a complicated, trilateral set of legal

relations between the Occupying Power, the temporarily ousted sovereign authority, and the

inhabitants of occupied territory.92 The fact of occupation gives the Occupying Power the right

to govern enemy territory temporarily, but does not transfer sovereignty over occupied territory

 

https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/DoD%20Law%20of%20War%20Manual%20-%20June%202015%20Updated%20Dec%202016.pdf?ver=2016-12-13-172036-190

Anonymous ID: fab0c0 May 22, 2023, 12:49 p.m. No.18887135   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>18887118

I really like this one. They couldn't very well have the US military going around knocking over Countries and then the US becomes the new soverign -as shit has always worked in conquest. They have this rule so they can install their own government puppets and become the sovereigns themselves โ€ฆtechnically.

 

"The fact of occupation gives the Occupying Power the right to govern enemy territory temporarily, but does not transfer sovereignty over occupied territory "