>>18889088 (pb)
>>18889035 (pb)
with no way of knowing, and no reason to need to know, it's stated that an anon 'is gay'.
who cares? why would that matter?
it's a 'attack on masculinity' classic ad hominem attack
You have no idea what anon's voice sounds like.
if there are 'no women on the Internet'
why do you want there to be gays?
I posit just for the same reason that there are no women on the Internet,
There are no gays on the Internet.
you first, anon.
sounds dangerous.
maybe you shouldn't.
why do you post stuff that would be dangerous to people?
I think you're outting yourself as an enemy of the board, anon.
what makes you people think it's OK to do this kind of hazing?
were you hurt and hazed yourselves?
you're obsessed with me.
are you sure you're not the one who is gay?
how do you know I'm even a guy?
I know exactly where I am. when people are as unfriendly as you and the other one, I don't see them as anon and I like to waste their time and draw them out so that their supervisors ask them later 'why did you waste your time with that one?'
the other one thinks I see myself as a victim.
why would I?
it might have been once.
why do you think it's OK to put people down when you have no idea about them?
why would you think that is correct behavior for a free speech board?
what purpose other than just to be a jerk?
how does it benefit you to haze a random stranger on a free speech board?
obviously you know nothing about me and you make up stuff just to be a bully about it.
but I really would like to know what motivates you to waste your time hazing random people?