https://redstate.com/benkew/2023/05/24/target-removes-satanic-linked-lgbt-merchandise-citing-volatile-circumstances-n750653
I knew that there had to be more to than just rainbows.
?
anons do not think and act and sound the same, anon.
and 'blaming' anons is like raving at the wind and the rain.
the 'nothing anon ever do is good enough' psyop.
most Americans accept the rainbow being usurped as a sad fact. And don't care about rainbows on clothes.
seeing devil worship material in a mainline store, on the other hand, is offensive to probably most people.
and you're point in tagging me was?
just to cause conflict?
what a dope.
like >>18897776
you have any power here.
you should listen to the video linked here and apply it to all the anon:
you sound like the slander shill who makes things up about people who you have no idea about and then badgers them for the rest of the bread.
Bobby Kennedy understands this.
I'm not really one to understand why 'little people' dislike Donald Trump.
I think he's a great president.
but I hear others go on with talking points from 6 years ago that were made up bs, and they still believe it.
It's gotta be Trump as president again, I say.
and why?
because he's got the correct point of view, respects the office and the people, and he did a great job the first time.
Did I just have an instinct about him? I supported him from when he first announced (was it June of 2015).
so, no, I can't have this argument. I'm too biased.
it's Trump and it's gotta be Donald Trump, 45th president to be the 46th.
he did everything right.
Dan is pretty excellent at what he does already.
I just wanted to point out that Mr. Trump has a solid support group.
Mr. Trump has good instincts and he might have some aces up his sleeve that he'll pull out when the time is right, and I mean solid people who are fit for the task.
people without jobs were hazed out of the job market by the marxists who ran all the job search engines.
by 'the peeple' he means you who posted this.
blah blah blah IP hopper. hop along. don't care what you say.
see how that works, I'm discussing some stuff and IP hopper says stupid stuff to instigate a response, I dismiss it, and two more IP hoppers come in and try to cause more brew-ha-ha.
I've filtered all three but that won't matter because it's probably the same person.
I don't have a point except to say that they fester here, no matter what their method.
who on a cell phone takes the time to badger someone random about nonsense to try to instigate a nonsense response? answer me that.
I am right but not for what you say.
nonsense is nonsense and you say things to instigate.
why do you do that, anon, why?