She's clearly been given instructions to plow that furrow. It will depend on what happens on the ground, but she's playing a very dangerous game.
Those who resort to violence will be a pitifully small minority. They're already alienating casual supporters. This is why they have to be allowed to continue what they're doing and sink their own ship.
Trump is already doing this with the Northern Triangle in Central America. Expect to see much more. Economic development and improved governance is key to stemming the migratory impulse. But the drug cartels and the Mexican Government are the biggest villains of the piece. The squeeze is going to be put around Mexico's throat.
Yes. And it's very dangerous. But if the Mexican people vote for this horse's ass they have to expect it will not go well. Tourism from the US will collapse and the trade war will be intense. The wall will make Mexico a pressure cooker.
Ownership is irrelevant. It's power to move a market that counts.
See Catherine Austin Fitts on this subject. She's come out openly and said it's an op.
I meant BTC, but perhaps I was posting against the wrong thread… Apologies, if so.
Concur. And when a "currency" behaves like a speculative commodity, it's not a currency, at least not in the sense understood by Classical Economics!
Bad precedent. Never allow a government to put shit in your body!
The "D" stands for "Distribution"
Nothing forced the left into refusal to cooperate. That was their self-selected stance upon losing the election.
The threat to the financial system is real and ever-present. But doing so with T at the helm will not result in the usual socialization of bankster losses. No doubt this is under consideration by the cabal, but it could also be self-defeating for them.
I'm not complacent, but I suspect that significant contingency planning has already been undertaken.