Anonymous ID: 00b9b6 May 26, 2023, 2:28 p.m. No.18907702   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7729

>>18907628

I'm all for a good dig on History.

your accusatory 'you know nothing' bit that you're doing (knowing nothing about me) is a slide.

post real history, not false accusations that slander whole civilizations and display your lack of discernment and quickness to falsely judge others about whom you know nothing.

do post a dig

don't slide nonsense History.

Anonymous ID: 00b9b6 May 26, 2023, 2:39 p.m. No.18907747   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7751 >>7774

>>18907729

as I said you have no idea what I studied over the years, and what my hobbies are, where I live, what I know, where I've seen stuff, what I have visited, what hilltops I've been to, and all of that. You don't know what books I read (which were many) articles I read, classes I took, what languages I studied, what fields I was interested in, which mueseums I've been to, and stories I've heard from people who I met, some of whom knew stuff that was not well known.

you have no idea what I have seen and found on my own, nor what I know about what you are talking about, which is rather a lot.

or what mysteries I think are important to solve, and what I know about History, in general, just based upon where I live and the people I know.

but you have to slide this.

you have to pretend to be some expert doing some deep reveal 'oh no, the Smithsonian buries history'

 

how long have I heard this same story? how many sources I have I seen that verify it? what did I find out myself visiting various mueseums, and reading the monument and epigraphs on gravestones.

 

you know nothing about me but you're willing to pretend you do.

that being said as you know nothing about me and paint a false picture of me, why would I trust any Historical narrative that you would present?

if you cant keep from slandering some random anon, why would anyone not expect that you'd slander History too?

 

again: do a real dig, and post it.

what you are doing is innuendo and false narrative.

Anonymous ID: 00b9b6 May 26, 2023, 2:42 p.m. No.18907759   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7767

>>18907751

but I don't pretend to know your history, anon.

I do know that you don't know about me but pretend to, so I have to conclude that you will pretend to know History and state it as if it's verifiable when it's just made up in your head.

you are sliding.

again: post a real dig

do real research.

Anonymous ID: 00b9b6 May 26, 2023, 2:45 p.m. No.18907780   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7818

>>18907767

I pointed out your slander towards Romans, Greeks, and Eygptians, that's what I did.

and as far as 'conquest of Mexico'

it's never been completely conquered, has it?

even to this day, there are people who think that they run things and the other people say 'no you don't'.

Anonymous ID: 00b9b6 May 26, 2023, 2:56 p.m. No.18907841   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7846

>>18907818

give it up anon. I think learning Mexican history is fine.

please do.

I did not like you lumping those civilizations in with the brutal cannibel Aztecs, who were invaders and horrible.

If you'd slandered the Mayans, I'd have called you out on that, too.

I used to read a lot about Mexican History and then one day I realizes that the stuff comeing out of Harvard and Columbia universities was all made up. They had no real clue about Maya or preHistoric Mexico , it was all just fantasy of free mason archeologists.

The Maya Codex was cracked and still there is very much to learn.

I applaud you for wanting to know these things, but don't lump Aztecs in with anyone. They were horrible and an aberration in Mexican history.

they were horrible.

Anonymous ID: 00b9b6 May 26, 2023, 3:43 p.m. No.18908057   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18908051

more like 'when someone tries to start a conflict with someone who was only providing information and doesn't do the conflict thing'

 

grow up, troll who accuses others of treason for no reason.