Previous Bread:

>>1891354

I think much of what you are posting would be great at building a knowledge base for normies to understand, legally, what's happening and how it is to unfold. I'm not sure Q is "calling us to action", but I'm open to persuasion on that.

I take Q to heart when they say we're "watching a movie". I want to say that all the pieces are coming together. The occasional pause in movement (or our perception of it) is because of things like what happened with the border this weekend (likely cause of the postponed Q&A). Q team were forced to act on the border "right the fuck now" because it was weaponized on the administration so swiftly.

The various EOs signed by Trump has put their assets on short notice. Whatever they have left, they will spend on their planned "riots" and "marches". The 35k sealed indictments? Let's remember what Huber's role is in this. It's been revealed to us, yes; but to the public? Our job has been getting memes in place to help the public understand what's unfolding:

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1732078.html#1732221

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/31/turley-sessions-using-utah-federal-prosecutor-much-better-trump-2nd-special-counsel/

I think starting a "Legalfags" thread is a great idea to share how, legally, things are going to transpose. I also think normies would get a TON of useful input on that as it's explained by lawfags.

>>1891472

You're fine, baker. TY!!

>>1891522

You may have misunderstood what I was getting at. A Legalfag board would make the implications of everything going on here digestible to the normies like myself that may not have a whole lot of knowledge about that type of subject matter.

We all know that tons of legalfags are here, hence the Pacer drops on the very day they happened. I'm constantly amazed at the show of diversity of this board (skills, race, religion (or lack thereof), etc). If we can have side-bar discussions like Chess, Civic Nationalism, and the sort, why not a Legalfag thread?

Also, implying that Sessions and Wray aren't doing shit is contradicting Q. I hope you realize that.

>>1891571

Here ya go, anon.

>>1891509

Meant to link to you as well.

>>1891809

>>1891615

They are doing the same thing the clockfags keep doing. Just don't response to shills. If you watch them close enough, they have conversations back and forth between each other pretending to be anons. It's fucking hilarious because no one's falling for it.

>>1891832

>>1891853

>Q hasn't done shit but disinfo

Q has said trust the plan way more than "disinfo".

>Sessions and Wray haven't done shit

Really anon?

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1197303.html#1197560

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/31/turley-sessions-using-utah-federal-prosecutor-much-better-trump-2nd-special-counsel/

Don't start glowing, guys.

>>1892015

Incitefag.