Question: Recent "news" stories talk about employees getting fired and such when they defend either themselves or the apparent property of their "employer". Major corporations seem to be sending a strange message that if you work for them you are supposed to risk your live without the right to self defense and you are supposed to allow theft. Personally, I don't believe that corporations can own property, only men and women can. However, robbing stores is still counterproductive. This would normally hurt the people dependent on the corporate store for their income and put the thief at risk of jail (not always at this point).
My question is: If a non-human corporation (which has no rights) claims ownership of property that it will give away for free to "certain" people who don't pay, then would it be wrong in a collapse situation for employees to consider the corporate property "theirs" and take control of those assets and sell them in any manner they see fit for their own survival?