>QR is AOC /ourplant/
She has long been (speculated as) 'our girl', Anon. [They] have been planting agents in Congress for decades, at least. Can you think of any other random representatives whom the media has elevated for no apparent reason? How many out of 400+ names do you know?
>Not many liberals that are happy.
Outstanding observation, Anon! Indeed, many liberals seems to be sucking the bitter fruits of failed ambitions and expectations. Not 'our' 'bartender', though. Many opposition entities have been chose based on 'appeal', why not a WH asset?
>who is GB?
Don't be discouraged by comments. Why not provide an analysis of a relevant Q post? News unlocks.
>Its already been since Nov 2022 since he last posted
But Q provides an explanation for current developments. The material is not predictive as some attempt to suggest. It is explanative as news seeps into the mainstream.
>he knew
'he'? Always thought of this as a 'Q' team due to differing writing styles. Don't see much value in predicting dates, but rather milestones and events. Anon thinks Q is best read from that perspective.
Less than 10 executing a precise plan with the ability to predict a date of execution within five years? I don't buy it and I do not agree that Q should be interpreted on the basis of hour-day-week-month-yearly deltas. Deltas were done to authenticate in 2017-2018. They mean nothing more than numerology.
>There was that one time, at Band Camp…
>the point isnt to figure out the future
Agreed. Not the future - but whatever news is current. That's what Q meant by 'future proves past'. Understand current events with what Q wrote as background to your understanding.
https://qalerts.app/?q=future+proves+past
So who had troops stationed in Brazil prior to and including 1996?
Got it. Thank you. It does not address 'grandpa was stationed in Brazil' in 1996, however.
Danke mein Freund. du bist sehr klug.