>>18929193

What are the odds? They would have you believe that when events line up on the so-called Q clock, it is a rare occurrence. And the sheer preponderance of rare occurrences is a proof of the clock's validity.

The chance of any event lining up directly on the clock is 1 in 60. But anons can draw the line straight across to the other side of the clock. This improves the odds to 1 in 30. You are also allowed zig-zag to the right or left and claim up to "two days early". Having a three day window to connect improves the odds yet again. So the chances of ANY single event lining up on the Q clock is 1 in 20.

But there is ANOTHER way to make an event match! Year-deltas can appear 1 in every 5 or 6 spokes. There are now enough spokes that the odds of a year delta line up are around 1 in 90. When you employ all the wiggle tricks used above, the odds improve so that hitting a year delta will happen about 1 in 30 times.

So we have 1 in 20 for a direct line-up. And 1 in 30 for year deltas. So the probability of both ways combined makes the odds of any event lining up on the Q-clock 1 in 12. 1 in 12 are good odds. The odds of throwing snake eyes in dice is 1 in 36. You are three times more likely to match ANY event on the Q clock than you are to throwing snake eyes. ANY given event has a pretty damn good chance of lining up on the clock.

What are the odds? 1 in 12. They would have you believe that when events line up on the so-called Q clock, it is a rare occurrence. That is far from the case. It is actually a near mathematical certainty, rather than a mathematical impossibility, for lots of different events to line up on the Q clock.

>>18929203

Did Q say to make the Q clock base 60 (minutes)? No. Why shouldn't the Q clock be base 12 (dirunal hours) instead? Or a base 360 (seconds)? Or since Q is alledgely military intelligence related, why shouldn't the Q clock be base 24?

The truth is, Q never said to create a base 60 clock. Q never said to create a Q clock at all.

>>18929279

The clock is pure schizo. It's classic "make it mean whatever you want" numerology that's been used to prove things like Jesus return or the end of the world.

>>18929295

In a base-10 system the mirror is 04

In a base-12 system the mirror is 10

In a base-24 system the mirror is 21

But you choose a base 60 system. Justify your base 60 system over these other perfectly valid and useful choices to represent a clock.

>>18929327

I'm shilling for reality and common sense you stooge. Anyone who doesn't agree with you is obviously a shill. It's not that you made up a cultish divination device and you're trying to draw others into it like a charlatan.

>>18929348

It doesn't mean anything. Slushy math rules that you can bend and twist at will lead you to find the results you want. Just keep working the numbers and eventually you will find a "connection". Only it's not a connection when you make up the rules to get the result you want. And there are so many rules in the ways you can link two events that you will usually be able to arbitrarily link them. Does it really take a big brain to understand that?

>>18929349

So order is critical but the Q-clock does nothing to account for that.

You assume "the graphic" is the clock. But he never referenced the clock.

You assume "the map" is the clock. But he never referenced the clock.

It's all made up and completely unsanctioned.

>>18929395

WRONG! Numbers are precise, distinct and immutable. Formulas, algorithms and rules are malleable. The human mind is the ultimate pattern matching engine and its so good at it, it will make up patterns if it can't find them. That's why we see faces in clouds. It's not that there are people in the clouds. It's that we are wired to pattern match even when there is no pattern.