>>1893464

I believe the existence of Q is certainly not Anti-Bible. It examines the difference between Matthew, Luke and Mark and the differences within them being part of Q. It examines the differences. My first post was written by a Friar. Ok.. I grew up Catholic and, until recently, wouldn't question it. This article below examines these differences. My point is, what if Q has been around much longer than just recently? Just throwing that out there since nothing is what it seems anymore.

http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/q-exist.html