Anonymous ID: 2b7989 Jan. 10, 2018, 10:35 p.m. No.19389   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9412

>>19322

Depends. Why is Q making the posts to begin with? Is Q trying to leak information like a standard insider? Is Q presenting codified information to an audience?

 

Those who view Q as a normal insider, operating as an organic person would will be disappointed. Q is a character - a construct conceived for a very specific role as a sort of NPC or dungeon master's Oracle. Q is not a 'person' in the same way most anons are. Q is an avatar of a concept and will act accordingly.

 

Dates and times are important. What Q posts and when Q posts is part of the code. Hell… It could even be possible that the board transition and fuck ups were part of that code, too - scripted events.

 

It could also be possible that they were organic events that fell outside of the script and will need some clarification from Q in the future to bring the relevant pieces back into focus. Either way, Q isn't our shrink or cheer leader.

Anonymous ID: 2b7989 Jan. 10, 2018, 10:39 p.m. No.19418   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>19377

There was one who was apparently working on commission and trying to pay off a mansion in one night. That… Or he truly believed himself. Someone either ban hammered him and he doesn't bounce his IP, or he just hit his commission cap.

Anonymous ID: 2b7989 Jan. 10, 2018, 11:17 p.m. No.19577   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9726

>>19530

Yes… And no.

 

The problem with those setups is that the loudest or most physically intimidating tend to drive the group. That is why this platform can be as productive as it is. We have some powerful social instincts that shut down conversation, rather than promote it. Bobblehead culture rules in most boardrooms.

 

Here, there is much less suppression of ideas. If there is a weakness, it is that it can be hard to find what information has been posted by other anons. It is incumbent upon the anons (bakers and the community) to repeat worthwhile ideas to keep them noticed and in the flow of discussion.

 

Frankly… Hidden chan boards would probably go a long way toward improving corporate decision making. Or the style there of. When the CEO loses his or her rank and can see what people who work the floors actually think and how they address problems at their level - it can be a very powerful tool.

 

Provided there is the will and intent to actually use it as such. Key operating phrase….

Anonymous ID: 2b7989 Jan. 10, 2018, 11:24 p.m. No.19606   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9614 >>9627 >>9631

>>19580

To wind some clocks, you must run the hands backward. You spin backward through time to stop at the current time and let it run forward.

 

If we start at the first Q drops, then we come up to "now" - then the clock will run from the most recent events and markers back to the first ones left by Q.

 

How I interpret it. But I am not exactly a good codefag.

Anonymous ID: 2b7989 Jan. 10, 2018, 11:42 p.m. No.19675   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>19631

The best way to work through problems is to start at their most simple expression and add complexity only as necessary.

 

We start with a simple clock. Numbers represent hours. Maybe minutes. Perhaps we add a "day" counter to the number of times the clock has passed 12/0. These could be visualized as internal rungs on a spider web, if need be.

 

Or, maybe those aren't necessary and we are confounding ourselves.

 

The significance of these markers is related to another map. The clock may be our timepiece, but the map is how we understand what is being timed. The map would likely just be the network of criminals and their organization.

 

Because the time piece starts at the small and works to the large, we need the map to understand the significance of events. The small fry being forced out or put in jail is part of greater things to come. The big things we want to see is farther at the end.

 

I suspect that the clock is released at the point we receive the suspected EBS. The end of the Q "game" is the start of the clock. At that point, we are supposed to understand what is going on and be able to communicate to others that this is part of a plan.

 

Why the lengths to do this will probably become apparent if I am correct. The initial reaction and belief will be that we failed. But in a game of chess, the king is not the piece that commands - it is the piece that, once it can no longer escape capture, the game is lost.

 

Naruto, of all things, had an interesting bit on who or what the real king is - and who the pieces that could be sacrificed for a strategy were.

Anonymous ID: 2b7989 Jan. 11, 2018, 12:05 a.m. No.19777   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9798

>>19726

It is an amazing team. Perhaps, once our world is great again, we will be more free to find each other to collaborate on other productive tasks. We could spend our time being autists for physics projects or engineering challenges - rallying in the real world when needed to see idea put to practice.

 

I have a dream… That the planefags and the codefags will dine at the table of achievement with the electrofags beneath an open source civil radar module.

 

Or… Something. Sky is just the beginning, much less the limit.

Anonymous ID: 2b7989 Jan. 11, 2018, 12:10 a.m. No.19809   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9867

>>19755

That is exactly what I would program a chatbot to say. Wouldn't you?

 

Do androids dream of electric sheep?

 

If I take the life of myselves to save myself… Is it murder? And you are right… It was closer to an hour. Your ID changed and so you had to have shifted IPs. Which means a new captcha. You were absent for something like an hour. Then start flooding, again.

 

Seems only logical to assume the hour of you not posting was the length of time you couldn't post as you tried to get a captcha that you could read or randomly guess correctly without triggering an IP timeout from the server.