Wonderful work, Baker! Thanks for baking the [0] post in there.

>>18994

I must stress that the [0] post is not my work. I tried very had to defend the anon that posted it. I checked, double-checked, and triple-checked that anons work. Others did too.

It's solid and correct. That anon found the [0] post.

>>19032

This is the correct Baker. Followed him from the last bread. He said he'd continue to bake very early on. The other Baker should delete their bread.

>>19046

>>19085

I wish we could do trips to prove I'm not a shill. Then, you'd know who I am.

Baker, I know it's often a thankless task. I'm a Baker myself. You've done great work, Patriot! Godspeed.

>>19127 ← Correct

Thanks for standing for truth, Patriot! God bless.

>>19132

Never baked on this new board, so I can safely say no.

>>19141

Sorry, anon, it has never been about UTC. We only deal in EST here since that is Q team's timezone.

I saw nothing in your posts that proved that both images were UTC, so that doesn't fly either.

This anon is correct.

>>19127

Interesting… I filtered just one anon and this bread has just become a lot more comfy.

>>19230

I did compare them in the same timezone: EST. I provided screenshots the same as you. The fact that I dwell in EST makes me not have to worry about time conversions like others. The onus is on you to prove two UTC graphics. Just throwing up a graphic (as you did) proves nothing. No one knows where you got those graphics. Many already think you're here to intentionally throw us off the scent.

I believe in you anon. Do the right thing and provide proof.

>>19290

Thank you.

>Step 1. Open tor.

I will try step 1.

>Step 2. Open twitter. Change your settings to UTC time.

I cannot do step 2 because I don't have a Twatter account.

>Step 3. Compare.

Step 3 - See Step 2.

Once again, I'm already in EST, so I've already done the comparison. I've been doing these comparisons and all the others check out fine: [15] [10] [5]. Why wouldn't [0] check out if the rest are fine?

>>19338

I still get the same time for 4plebs, using tor.

>>19345

I just checked 4plebs via tor and got the same result.

I agree that the UNIX timestamp is superior to any other method.

>>19404

My original EST time matches what I find via tor. I stand by my verdict that we have found the [0] we were seeking.

>>19426

>>19411

>>19442

Pics for truth.

Pic 1 - TOR browser to 4plebs shows time of 22:15:48

Pic 2 - www.worldtimebuddy.com set to the 6PM hour at the time of the Q post. It shows a 4-hour difference to convert to EST. Subtract 4 hours from 22:15:48 and you have 18:15:48, which is the exact same time logged in my raw text data and what I see when visiting 4plebs without tor. Like I said, after the actual day of daylight savings time, 4plebs auto-corrects its time. It is trustworthy.

>>19474

yw, anon.