dChan
Anonymous ID: 693c4f Jan. 10, 2018, 9:45 p.m. No.19099   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9106 >>9507 >>9540

Anyone able to say if this is reasonable?

 

The dossier was used to obtain FISA-702 "query approvals" (not warrant) so that they could review existing NSA information.

 

Does this hold up? The problem I see is that Nunes could tell everyone there was no warrant. A FISA warrant and it's contents are classified, but the nonexistence of one is not.

Would there be a reason to not reveal this?

Anonymous ID: 693c4f Jan. 10, 2018, 9:52 p.m. No.19154   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9162 >>9164

>>19106

 

How do you know there was a warrant? Who was it against? Are you referring to Carter Page?

 

"Former ODNI Clapper says no such Title III authorizations were taken. No wiretaps were made of candidate Trump, Trump tower, or the Trump campaign. Ergo, no FISA Warrant was needed."

Anonymous ID: 693c4f Jan. 10, 2018, 10:17 p.m. No.19301   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19162

 

Anything to back that up? Please provide evidence of any warrant.

 

Why is that somehow more credible than FISA 702-17 searches conducted by the NSD based on the dossier? Unlawful NSA queries would accomplish the same thing as getting a warrant, would it not?

Anonymous ID: 693c4f Jan. 10, 2018, 11:23 p.m. No.19602   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19540

 

That's the way I see it, too. I think it's plausible, though. Nunes revealed that the Trump campaign was the victim of "incidental collection and may have been "monitored".

 

Not that I trust Clapper, but it seems likely he is telling the truth that there was no warrant/wiretapping that he was aware of.

 

I suppose revealing that there was no warrant doesn't really change anything.