>>18934

>>18939

there are 2 of you

>>18998

the other one has more posts. i'd go there

>>19051

baker confirms

>>19370

>>19302

the anon who posted it probably asked for it to be deleted.

see:

>>18395

>>19454

i've looked at that several times since it was posted, and it still doesn't make sense to me. anon loses me in the 2nd half of it. i'm not asking for an explanation tho. don't want to shit up the board. i'll look at it again in my own time.

>>19502

on the minute hand of a clock, 1 full hour is 60 minutes, a complete reset. it factors down to 0. 23:15 and 22:15 both put the minute hand at :15, making the difference of the minute hand be 0

>>19525

i fully acknowledge that. it's still open for debate, imo

>>19560

>Wind the CLOCK

i still think "wind" is important, but i struggle to see how it's important or what its meaning is. i commented in a different thread, but it's since been bumped off the catalog.

>>>/thestorm/21439

>>19608

no, i understand that part of it. i just think there's something more to it - like this anon is saying >>19606

i'm also not a cryptofag, so it's difficult for me to visualize

>>19618

see my other post here >>19466

>>19619

if it's going to be edited, i would say don't delete it, but maybe point out it's in debate?

>>19640

>Group all the 15's together, the 10's together, etc.

see:

>>12265

pastebin.com/UfNbiyMK