Anonymous ID: d12898 Jan. 10, 2018, 10:42 p.m. No.19435   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19408

Just guessing at a few things.

 

tmrw = tomorrow

 

watch m[–]ch = watch MSNBC(?) channel

 

Ban.saf = this ID can't be banned, therefore IDENs Q team by their control of the comms?

Anonymous ID: d12898 Jan. 10, 2018, 10:49 p.m. No.19464   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19414

 

>countdown code 7153

 

If seconds, 7153/60/60=1.98694444444

= Just under 2 hours

 

If minutes, 7153/60=119.216666667 hours = 4.96736111111 days

= just under 5 days

 

Anybody?

Anonymous ID: d12898 Jan. 10, 2018, 11:07 p.m. No.19540   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9602

>>19099

>The problem I see is that Nunes could tell everyone there was no warrant. A FISA warrant and it's contents are classified, but the nonexistence of one is not.

>Would there be a reason to not reveal this?

 

This is difficult to parse. Let me try:

 

Nunes has access to the classified info.

 

If there is a FISA warrant, it's classified and Nunes cannot say whether or not one exists. In this case if he denies that one exists he would be lying. If he states that one exists he would be breaking the law. So if we see Nunes say nothing, we might conclude that he knows of the existence of a classified warrant but cannot talk about it.

 

If there is no FISA warrant, that information is not classified. In this case Nunes could say there is no warrant. Or he could likewise say nothing, and leave people speculating whether there is or is not one.

Anonymous ID: d12898 Jan. 10, 2018, 11:24 p.m. No.19612   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9623

>>19454

I'm an abstracter not a detailer, so I got off on the structure and how it fits the puzzle. As to actually filling in the details and checking them, that is not my strong suit.

Really had an Aha! moment when I first studied it, as apparently did many other anons who replied in similar fashion.

Anonymous ID: d12898 Jan. 10, 2018, 11:31 p.m. No.19636   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9646 >>9779

>>19458

So 4-10-20 is the designation for requesting an IRS audit? It isn't a date then. The 4-10-20 is an instruction from the IRS to its examiners directing them how to perform an examination process. Cool. The Clinton Foundation needs to be audited. Charles Ortel has already spent a few years trying to unravel their books and has identified many questionable aspects.

 

On the IRS website at irs.gov/irm/part4/irm_04-010-020

4.10.20.1 (05-04-2017)

Program Scope and Objectives

Purpose: This IRM states the policy and guidelines that examiners must use when requesting taxpayer workpapers, such as:

Audit workpapers

Tax accrual workpapers

Tax reconciliation workpapers

Publicly traded corporations and other large collectively owned entities typically use these types of workpapers. The Service has different policies for seeking access to each of these types of documents.

Audience: The primary users of this IRM are examiners in all divisions, Appeals officers and attorneys.

Note: These provisions do not apply in cases being investigated by Criminal Investigation. …

Anonymous ID: d12898 Jan. 10, 2018, 11:53 p.m. No.19723   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9835

>>19565

This website is for checking brokers. Couldn't get archive.is to archive it (incompatible user agent on their side).

Just happened to notice that McCourt once worked for a Rothschild-affiliated company.

Screencap related.

Anonymous ID: d12898 Jan. 11, 2018, 12:02 a.m. No.19761   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9793

>>19570

Anagrams for beercon

 

Be Crone

Bee Corn

Beer Con

Bone Rec

Cob En Re

Be Rec No

Be Rec On

Be Con Re

 

None of the above. Somebody with a different style of autism take a crack at this. See >>19745 for context.