OMFG Stating the Obvious is so fucking heroic!
DROPS SAY ELON WAS WORKING WITH CIA TO SUPPLY NK WITH SHIT TO EMP NUKE YOUR ASS AND KILL US ALL
MUH FUCKING HERO!
MUH FUCKING DROPS!
MUH FUCKING PATRIOT!
MUH FUCKING ANON!!!!
MUH DROPS!!!!
WE?
MUH DROPS AND MUH ELON THOUGH!
MUH HERO'S!!!
MAD ABOUT TRANNIES AND BUD LIGHT!
>>18941041WEF you say?!?!?!!? You are almost dangerous!
THE COUNCIL FOR INCLUSIVE CAPITALISM WITH THE VATICAN
BRAINCHILD of LYNN ROTHSCHILD
Think W.E.F. but way worse.
Members refer to themselves as "Guardians" and the Pope is their Spiritual Leader.
Q drop #1413 Q named the Image of an Owl "Guardian_P" in a drop about the "Guardian of the Pope"
Psssst! P does not = Payseur, Pindar, Pymander, President, Pussy nor Pain
What is: The Council for Inclusive Capitalism With The Vatican!?But WEF WEF WEF though huh?! kek
https://www.inclusivecapitalism.com/
https://www.inclusivecapitalism.com/member-magazine-2022/
https://www.inclusivecapitalism.com/organizations/
OVER 600 COMPANIES INCLUDING SUCH LUMINARY HUMANITARIANS ORG'S SUCH AS: VISA, BANK OF AMERICA, BAYER, DUPONT, FORD FOUNDATION, H&R BLOCK, IBM, J&J, MASTERCARD, MERCK, MOTOROLA, NESTLE, ROCKEFLLER FOUNDATION, PAYPAL, VERIZON AND EVEN THE OFFICE OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE TREASURER.
https://www.inclusivecapitalism.com/about/
https://www.inclusivecapitalism.com/our-stewards/ 5 PAGES
https://www.inclusivecapitalism.com/our-allies/ 3 PAGES
https://www.coalitionforinclusivecapitalism.com/coalition-leadership/lynn-forester-de-rothschild/
https://www.coalitionforinclusivecapitalism.com/vatican-council/
https://www.youtube.com/c/InclusiveCapitalism The Council for Inclusive Capitalism has a YT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJoXwh0Vu9M The Council for Inclusive Capitalism with the Vatican. Dec 11, 2020 by: Inclusive Capitalism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJLuqCDRfyk Lynn Forester de Rothschild in conversation with Brian Moynihan and Roger Ferguson Jan 28, 2021 by: Inclusive Capitalism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mf9A6blti1U President Clinton’s Closing Keynote at 2015 Conference – What’s it all about: actions for the future Jul 22, 2015 by: Inclusive Capitalism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iO56RZE6SEQ His Holiness the Pope’s Statement at the 2015 Conference delivered by Cardinal Nichols Jul 22, 2015 by: Inclusive Capitalism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fa9FnoZeOF4 Inclusive Capitalism Conference - H.R.H. The Prince of Wales Jun 12, 2014 by: Inclusive Capitalism
https://youtu.be/VlW_PVhSfjM Pope Francis Joins Bank of America, Salesforce CEOs to Push for Economic Equality Dec 8, 2020
Bloomberg Quicktake: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-08/vatican-joins-moynihan-benioff-to-push-for-economic-equality
The Vatican said it’s joining Bank of America Corp.’s Brian Moynihan, Salesforce.com Inc.’s Marc Benioff and about 25 other leaders in an effort to create “a more equitable and sustainable economic system.”The Council for Inclusive Capitalism with the Vatican is comprised of executives, who collectively run companies employing 200 million workers in 163 countries. The group will meet annually with Pope Francis and Cardinal Peter Turkson, who oversees the Vatican’s Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development, according to a statement posted Tuesday.“An economic system that is fair, trustworthy, and capable of addressing the most profound challenges facing humanity and our planet is urgently needed,” the pope said in the statement. The newly created council will take on the challenge “by seeking ways to make capitalism become a more inclusive instrument for integral human wellbeing,” he said.
Despite global economic growth over the past few decades, business leaders have been slow to address the widespread disparities in wealth, race and gender. Under pressure from shareholders, customers and employees, they’ve started to confront those inequities.
For example, BlackRock Inc., the world’s largest asset manager, has said sustainability is a top investment priority, while Citigroup Inc. has vowed to spend $1 billion to help close the racial income gap. And last year, the Business Roundtable, which represents some of the largest U.S. corporations, said companies should consider all their stakeholders, not just generate profits for themselves and investors.
Members of the Vatican’s council include BP Plc Chief Executive Officer Bernard Looney, William Lauder of Estee Lauder Cos., Visa Inc. CEO Alfred Kelly, Fiona Ma, the treasurer for the state of California, and Mark Carney, the former governor of the Bank of England. Chiefs from companies, including Mastercard Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, and organizations such as the Rockefeller and Ford foundations also will sit on the council. Marcie Frost, CEO of the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, likens the council to the work done by Climate Action 100+, an initiative that seeks to put pressure on the world’s largest polluters. She said the council will hold companies accountable for their public commitments on everything from racial diversity to reducing carbon emissions.“Being aspirational doesn’t mean much over time,” Frost said in a telephone interview.
“We want to make sure companies are executing specific commitments,” she said, adding that data is vital in holding businesses to account and them achieving their goals.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-08/vatican-joins-moynihan-benioff-to-push-for-economic-equality
>>18941060well yer gonna love this!
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND THE VATICAN CONNECTION
< - - -Clickto watch youtube video
Vatican control of World Health Organization population policy
An interview with Milton P. Siegel
"This interview with Professor Milton P. Siegel, who for 24 years was the Assistant Director General of the World Health Organization, was recorded in 1992 by Dr. Stephen D. Mumford, President of the Center for Research on Population and Security. This is the first time that it has been made available to the public.
Because of his position and the length of his tenure, Professor Siegel is considered among the world's foremost authorities on the development of World Health Organization policy. In this interview, he reveals the influence of the Vatican in shaping WHO policy, particularly in blocking adoption of the concept that overpopulation is a grave public-health threat – a concept which, in WHO's early years, enjoyed a broad consensus among member countries.
Without this separation of population dynamics from WHO public-health policy, the Vatican would have found it much more difficult to subsequently manipulate governments on such issues as family planning and abortion. National leaders would have been able to refer to the international consensus, as demonstrated by WHO policy. WHO, they could have insisted, has determined that family planning and abortion – like clean water, good nutrition, and immunizations – are necessary to protect public health.
Professor Siegel decided to speak out on the subject. As he was involved in the WHO at an early stage, his personal experience provides ample evidence that the Vatican influenced WHO policy development from the outset, during the early period of the Interim Commission in 1946. In its 63-year history, this international health body has had a deplorable record in family planning. Its commitment has been minuscule, and even today family planning accounts for only a tiny fraction of its budget.
Professor Siegel joined the World Health Organization in 1946, when it was still in its formative stages – under the umbrella of the United Nations, created just the year before. Because of his earlier work in North America and the Middle East, he was asked, in effect, to be one of WHO's "founding fathers". So he came on board on the senior staff of the Interim Commission. Dr. Brock Chisholm of Canada was the Executive Director of the Commission, which set up the permanent organization with headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland. Dr. Chisholm was chosen to be WHO's first Director General."
TRAITORS ALL SAY THE SAME THING! P = POPE!
Q DROP #1413
Guardian of the Pope Owl Photo
Q !4pRcUA0lBE 17 May 2018 - 8:15:27 PM
Guardian_P.png
Guardian of the Pope.
[Personal]
Q
IN TWO!
Anons know, twitchy
anons also know that you need that rent paid
those drops though…
So why all the commotion?
[bad guys] up yer guts yet would you even notice?!?!!?
Who cares!
They guard muh religion!
muh mother!
muh fears!
muh 90% catholic!
hep muh!
God works in mysterious 1% ways, scro!
stop it!
All sorts of drops about LDR but that WEF though!
WEF WEF WEF!
kek
Oh no!
Another false [DECODE] goes down!
Drops though…
>>>18940981 Trans Babies? Health Centre Asks Parents if Their Newborns Are Transgender or Non-Binary
Yes and BTW what is the RELIGION? We need to know whether to sprinkle holy water or cut off the tip?
a sign that GOD would never use Water to Drown mankind again…
yet there is still FIRE, ICE and some other shit!
THINK you might be in a death cult?
doesnt read the bible
doesnt read the drops
muh opinion matters!
No
Anon thinks for self
DROP #3038
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 03/12/2019 14:55:14 ID: 4fe510
8chan/qresearch: 5643022
>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When‘non-dogmatic’information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather thanauthority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!
Q
dogma noun
dog·ma | ˈdȯg-mə , ˈdäg-
plural dogmas also dogmata ˈdȯg-mə-tə , ˈdäg-
Definition of dogma
1a: something held as an established opinion
especially : a definite authoritative tenet
b: a code of such tenets
pedagogical dogma
c: a point of view or tenet put forth as authoritative without adequate grounds
2: a doctrine or body of doctrines concerning faith or morals formally stated and authoritatively proclaimed by a church
DROP #3858
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 4b313a No.8113583 📁
Feb 12 2020 12:04:32 (EST)
GA2.21.JPG
⬇
[Re_drop]
What happens when 90% of the media is controlled/owned by (6) corporations?
What happens when those same corporations are operated and controlled by a political ideology?
What happens when the news is no longer free from bias?
What happens when the news is no longer reliable and independent?
What happens when the news is no longer trustworthy?
What happens when the news simply becomes an extension/arm of a political party?
Fact becomes fiction?
Fiction becomes fact?
When does news become propaganda?
Identity creation?
How does the average person, who is under constant financial stress (by design), find time to research and discern fact v fiction?
Majority of people more prone to believe someone in power sitting behind a big brand ‘news’ name?
Do people [human psyche] tend to follow the ‘majority/mainstream viewpoint’ in fear of being isolated and/or shunned?
‘Mainstream’ is used for a reason [dominate trend in opinion].
[If majority of people believe ‘x’ then ‘x’ must be validated / true]
Why do ‘mainstream’ media heads, within different orgs, always use the same keywords and/or catch phrases?
Coordinated? By who? Outside entity providing instructions?
Do they count on the fact that people [human psyche] are more prone to believe something if heard over-and-over again by different ‘trusted’ sources?
Do ‘echo chamber’ tactics provide validation / credibility to the topic/point being discussed?
Threat to intellectual freedom?
Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic?
Read again – digest.
Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic?
Logical thinking.
Why, after the election of 2016, did [D]’s and media corps jumpstart a [coordinated & planned] divisive blitz intended to create falsehoods re: illegitimacy of election, character assassination of POTUS through sexism, racism, every other ‘ism’?
Pre/post 2016 election?
Why were violent [masked] terror orgs such as Antifa immediately created/funded?
Why were these orgs tasked w/ immediate intimidation/shut down of any pro-POTUS rally[s] and/or events?
Why were marches immediately organized to counter and silence pro-POTUS rally[s] and/or events?
Why were marches immediately organized which divided people into sex/gender, race, [ism]?
When you control the levers of news dissemination, you control the narrative.
Control of the narrative = power
When you are blind, what do you see?
They want you divided.
Divided by religion.
Divided by sex.
Divided by political affiliation.
Divided by class.
When you are divided, and angry, and controlled, you target those ‘different’ from you, not those responsible [controllers].
Divided you are weak.
Divided you pose no threat to their control.
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or stable [livestock kept – sheep].
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
THIS REPRESENTS A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
Q
DROP #3905
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: fead75 No.8600954 📁
Mar 28 2020 14:15:18 (EST)
A person(s) value:
-
vote
-
monetary value (tax contribution)
Why is 'free thought' ridiculed, challenged, and threatened when a person is opposed to the 'mainstream-narrative'?
[2] remains fixed (degree allowable by 'economic recession/expansion')
[1] remains a variable
[1] dependent on a 'controlled' system of information dissemination
What happens when 90% of the media is controlled/owned by (6) corporations?
What happens when those same corporations are operated and controlled by a political ideology?
What happens when the news is no longer free from bias?
What happens when the news is no longer reliable and independent?
What happens when the news is no longer trustworthy?
What happens when the news simply becomes an extension/arm of a political party?
Fact becomes fiction?
Fiction becomes fact?
When does news become propaganda?
Identity creation?
How does the average person, who is under constant financial stress (by design), find time to research and discern fact v fiction?
Majority of people more prone to believe someone in power sitting behind a big brand ‘news’ name?
Do people [human psyche] tend to follow the ‘majority/mainstream viewpoint’ in fear of being isolated and/or shunned?
‘Mainstream’ is used for a reason [dominate trend in opinion].
[If majority of people believe ‘x’ then ‘x’ must be validated / true]
Why do ‘mainstream’ media heads, within different orgs, always use the same keywords and/or catch phrases?
Coordinated? By who? Outside entity providing instructions?
Do they count on the fact that people [human psyche] are more prone to believe something if heard over-and-over again by different ‘trusted’ sources?
Do ‘echo chamber’ tactics provide validation / credibility to the topic/point being discussed?
Threat to intellectual freedom?
Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic?
Read again – digest.
Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic?
Logical thinking.
Why, after the election of 2016, did [D]’s and media corps jumpstart a [coordinated & planned] divisive blitz intended to create falsehoods re: illegitimacy of election, character assassination of POTUS through sexism, racism, every other ‘ism’?
Pre/post 2016 election?
Why were violent [masked] terror orgs such as Antifa immediately created/funded?
Why were these orgs tasked w/ immediate intimidation/shut down of any pro-POTUS rally[s] and/or events?
Why were marches immediately organized to counter and silence pro-POTUS rally[s] and/or events?
Why were marches immediately organized which divided people into sex/gender, race, [ism]?
When you control the levers of news dissemination, you control the narrative.
Control of the narrative = power
When you are blind, what do you see?
They want you divided.
Divided by religion.
Divided by sex.
Divided by political affiliation.
Divided by class.
When you are divided, and angry, and controlled, you target those ‘different’ from you, not those responsible [controllers].
Divided you are weak.
Divided you pose no threat to their control.
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or stable [livestock kept – sheep].
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
THIS REPRESENTS A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
Q
DROP #4408
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 06/04/2020 15:48:02 ID: 00792f
8kun/qresearch: 9469167
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/enlightenment/
The Enlightenment is often associated with its political revolutions and ideals, especially the French Revolution of 1789. The energy created and expressed by the intellectual foment of Enlightenment thinkers contributes to the growing wave of social unrest in France in the eighteenth century.
The social unrest comes to a head in the violent political upheaval which sweeps away the traditionally and hierarchically structured ancien régime(the monarchy, the privileges of the nobility, the political power of the Catholic Church).
The French revolutionaries meant to establish in place of the ancien régime a new reason-based order instituting the Enlightenment ideals of liberty and equality.
…enlightenment with the process of undertaking to think for oneself, to employ and rely on one’s own intellectual capacities in determining what to believe and how to act.
Q
YOU COULD SAY ITS SERIOUS AND THIS ANON AIN'T A LIL BITCH
= [YOU] MIGHT BE A LITTLE BITCH
IN TRANSGRESSION!
Is you a little karen bitch in transgression?
muh muh muh muh!
nuh nuh!
muh muh muh!
bwahahahahahahahahahkek
Leaf!
cease and desist the mattis memes!
god fucking damnit~ :D
this is true