>>18947546

as baker you are a target.

don't take it personal, the global exists to avoid confusion

in my opinion even username Q should get blocked on here unless it has a tripcode.

your name isn't attached to it anyway.

>calling me a new baker is lame

new baker as in has not baked often, that's not meant as an insult. if you baked often, then that may be factually wrong. I don't know that.

baking can be stressful, so mistakes or other bullcrap happens, including shill attacks.

It's okay. anons are grateful for everyone that bakes.

>>18947629

It's fine.

Ignore people that attack you, those may be shills themselves, or anons who think that every mistake on here, especially made by a baker, equals that this someone just has to be a shill.

I see that you had that anonymity option active and that changes usernames to anonymous, but only a few seconds after a post shows up, which of course can confuse someone, thinking it's a board glitch.

and yes, you corrected yourself even in that thread, which is all that matters.

and it's also weird that no one contacted you as far as I can see. I saw the thread when notables were posted. I would have contacted you, if I would have been in that thread myself.

>>18947754

Yes, i see.

I also remember such fake-Q attacks before, and normally several anons reply to fake-Q-posts, calling it out.

That didn't happen either.

and i just looked back, this kind of attack hasn't happened for quite a while.

I went back to 18000000 and there were 2 fake Q posts before that, and that's it.

i don't even have an idea for what this forced anonymity option is. Maybe should get mentioned to BO, and then maybe Jim to take it out altogether.

>>18947787

→

>>18945187 (pb)

>Explain it for me through dayshift, I'm halfdead rn.

Next time mabbe reply to fake-Q, goingfake qand that's it.

And mabbe when baker posts about board glitch, reply to that and tell him that there is something wrong on his end.

→

>>18944833 (pb)

>Am I the only one seeing the damn Q tag glitch? There is def something about this guy.

Shit happens.

>>18947935

Didn't you do that in a convoluted way all by yourself?

>>18947986

Where does anyone tell you that you must do something?

>>18948066

I asked you where anyone told you that you must do something.

all i see is a simple suggestion.

mabbe look up the word mabbe <- also a suggestion, not an order

>>18948104

and you unironically wrote

>(read dictionary to understand real anons and their vocabulary).

earlier. you are almost funny.

>>18948119

>If you see something going wrong you stand up to fix it, period.

Agreed

That's what I literally wrote itt to baker.

The only reason why i didn't do it, is because I wasn't there and thus couldn't contact baker.

baker asks about board glitch, no one responds, but 10 hours later certain people in here have the time of the day to take a shit on baker. I don't like that.