>Why would they announce it
Ils veulent votre argent, monsieur la grenouille.
This man is worth listening to. Thank you.
"The radical division of societies we are witnessing did not come from nowhere but is very much sponsored."
Mislav Kolakuลกiฤ (born 15 September 1969) is a Croatian lawyer and politician who has been a Member of the European Parliament for Croatia since 2 July 2019, having been elected to the position at the 2019 election as an Independent. Previously, he served as a judge at the Zagreb Commercial Court.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mislav_Kolaku%C5%A1i%C4%87
>legendary city
>commercial center
>flourishing center of โฆ trade
>home of a prestigious university
>mud walls
One of these things is not like the others.
>Could this be the cause for the shaking. Perhaps it was not a sonic boom?
Perhaps a 'plane crash' was needed, once again, as a cover for a kinetic event of a different nature?
>Delta for todayโฆ
EAM LOYALISTS:
Divided Command?
Crossing red lines?
Power & Conflict: Crimson Tide
Pilot Hypoxia: How to Recognize and Respond to the High-Altitude Threat
https://www.pilotmall.com/blogs/news/pilot-hypoxia-how-to-recognize-and-respond-to-the-high-altitude-threat
>Is there any precedent for that other than being shot down?
"Original flight tests of 747s conducted in 1969 and 1970 took 747-100 models to speeds of Mach 0.99. In addition, Boeing knows one case in which a 747 operated by Evergreen International made an emergency descent at speeds that exceeded Mach 1."
"some reports indicate the plane reached speeds as high as Mach 1.25. Of course, this would put it beyond the supersonic limit."
https://simpleflying.com/supersonic-boeing-747-throwback/
Understood on airframe design differences. OP was seeking precedent for any airframe achieving a '30kft per minute' rate of descent.
>what a Boeing can handle
Speed of sound to feet per minute conversion:
Conversion number between speed of sound [s] and feet per minute [fpm] is 67441.6 (and it may have hit Mach 1.25!)
Video from volunteer pilot in chase plane:
The Heritage Foundation. The sponsored a fellowship at the Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies.
The John, Barbara, and Victoria Rumpel Senior Legal Research Fellow, Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies.
https://www.heritage.org/about-heritage/mission
>Any anons know what this is about?
>John & Barbara Rumpel
Looks like the Rumpels (three of them) endowed a legal fellowship at the Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies. Those searches are partly the bios of anyone who has held that fellowship. Someone with: 'The John, Barbara, and Victoria Rumpel Senior Legal Research Fellow, Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies' in their bio then wrote about or was quoted on the subject of Hillary Clinton.