Me thinks F-16 hit the Cessna with a rocket which caused it to descend at a rapid rate. Maybe it hit the tail off of it.
Im trying to find videos of how loud the missiles can get once detonated. I really do think they hit that poor Cessna with a missile and struck the tail off which caused it to nosedive.
Ny times has a good video where you can hear the boom a little clearer. If im not mistaken, don't sonic booms last a little longer than what sound was in the video? and i thought they made a sort of "ripping" sound as they go over.
heres sauce:
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/04/us/sonic-boom-washington-dc-maryland.html
>Tight spiral dive into the ground suggests loss or damage to a wing.
Thats what I was just reading about that i missed, a spiral dive would indicate a wing got fucked up not the tail.
>"Original flight tests of 747s conducted in 1969 and 1970 took 747-100 models to speeds of Mach 0.99. In addition, Boeing knows one case in which a 747 operated by Evergreen International made an emergency descent at speeds that exceeded Mach 1."
We gotta remember these are different planes than a 747. Airframes are different, engines, etc, what a Boeing can handle a Cessna citation may not be able to.
Gods work anon.
https://cessna.txtav.com/-/media/cessna/files/citation/cj4-gen2/cj4_gen2_brochure.ashx
https://cessna.txtav.com/-/media/cessna/files/citation/longitude/longitude_brochure.ashx
heres spec sheet.
Spec sheet for the cessna that was downed. disregard last cessna(s) spec sheets, they weren't the right ones.
>back in the day at least some anons would be calling this a flat out Q proof.
I don't know why it isn't being called a Q proof.
>>18953464 (me)
Bakes plz take out other cessna spec sheets. The plane was a Cessna Citation V. other 2 planes are CJ4 and a Longitude.
TY
sozz ill include. dont rush if needed. Ty tho.
sauce:
https://www.globalair.com/aircraft-for-sale/specifications?specid=189
make a bun with other posts linked to help bakes out. I see the connection your making and its a damn good one lol.