they must have some amazing blackmail material . . .
given that 'gay pride' is a cult, why is it that the Military funds it and supports it.
isn't it the establishment of a religion, over other Faiths?
Isn't it anti Christian?
why do they get away with funding it?
gay pride started as a marketting campaign for gay bars and city clubs.
The Pilgrims were welcomed.
There was a lot that went on before the Pilgrims ever showed up.
no one knows where the city of Norumbega was.
there was a war of unknown proportions that occured between the Abnaki and other groups.
there may have been Scots and Welsh who showed up but didn't tell anyone.
most people who were 'original inhabitants' would have lived out their lives, from birth to death, and for thousands of years, and were NEER slaughtered as you said.
there is no way to know who was here because DNA tests are prohibited on 'native remains'.
Natives intermarried with the French and the Spanish/Bourbons
some native groups were warriors who were about conquoring other native groups.
some natives may have been from Asia and only showed up a few generations before the Spanish.
the Aztecs were invaders from the North.
the Norse are known to have travelled as far as Minnosota.
the story is long and complex and you give a gloss, popular with Marxists.
the irony of that is that Marxists supposedly don't believe in racism and all people are equal.
and yet that bogus 'original inhabitants' story is promulgated and natives are agitated into becoming marxists, and often after a Eurasian woman marries into the family and takes over the tribe.
the bogus 'original inhabitants' narrative is a narritive of division.
did you know that the langauges of the Algonquin is very similar to Indo European languages? How could that be, anon, if they were here for thousands and thousands of years?
PS: The Pilgrims settled on lands that were owned by a man who had been to England whose family all died and wehn they showed up he thought it was a sign from God and let them live there. They were welcomed.
The Puritans were really screwed up, yes. The Pilgrims? not as bad as the Puritans in my estimation.
you should learn history.
all you've learned is propaganda.
I've heard that some of the 'tribes' in the Midwest actually were speaking Welsh!
we stuck a fork in the 'native peoples' psy op so now they roll out the 'bible is written by controllers' psyop.
they try to explain 4000 years of history in a single shit post.
we're suppose to reject everything we learned through careful study of Scriptures becasu some child never bothered to read the Bible or commentaries on the bible, or the History of the Mediterranean world, or study mythology and antiquity.
Small pox is a very sad fact of history.
to say that it was purposefully done is another one of the great lies.
I remember reading that there is only one account of it. supposedly in Western Pennsylvania.
from that it became that it was done purposefully to all Indians from the time of Columbus till Wounded knee and later.
how many different orders of Catholic monks were there anon?
I bet you don't know.
It's a lot.
I was not talking about the Corona Virus hoax, anon.
I was talking about the marxist talking point about 'tainted blankets' being traded to natives to cause a plague.
so in 1871?
or was it 1892?
or 1913?
ah, 1933
no, maybe 1963,
perhaps when Obama was installed?
your willing to trash millions of people over a period of 2 thousand years because ? ? ?
you're a bigot with a closed mind?
I not trying to vanquish you, anon.
I've got no problem with 'all American Colors', Mr. Pig.
I simply don't like that four hands clasped on wrists. If they were all the same skin tone I would find it equally as cringey.
whoever did it needs to be brought up on charges and treated like a war criminal!
I am assuming it was done by someone or some group.
make an example of them.
humanity should be past this kind of barbarism!
How? back then the American left supported free speech.
It seems to me that the reason that famephagging was discouraged was because the person put themselves in danger by doing it.
they became a target.
if they simply don't care, or can do it anonymously, like Mr. Pig, then it's not really an issue is it?
there are memes that say 'this is so and so meme maker, he/she also made these other memes'
but you don't know who it is.
they get an anonymous kind of fame.
that's not bad, is it?
for me the danger in say, for example, anjel G was that he got death threats for doing what he did.
He was all 'sweetness and light' and others would make horible threats and post really awful memes with his face.
so fame fagging is discouraged not because we hate the fame fag but because it is a danger to them.
but others say 'oh, no, hate the fame fag'